Kathleen M. Goodman

633 total citations
21 papers, 404 citations indexed

About

Kathleen M. Goodman is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathleen M. Goodman has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 404 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Education, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Kathleen M. Goodman's work include Higher Education Research Studies (11 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (7 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers). Kathleen M. Goodman is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Research Studies (11 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (7 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers). Kathleen M. Goodman collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Kathleen M. Goodman's co-authors include Ernest T. Pascarella, Tricia A. Seifert, Charles Blaich, John A. Mueller, Gregory C. Wolniak, Nathan Lindsay, Patricia M. King, Marcia B. Baxter Magolda, Mark H. Salisbury and Ryan D. Padgett and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Research in Higher Education and Journal of college student development.

In The Last Decade

Kathleen M. Goodman

19 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kathleen M. Goodman United States 10 262 104 83 39 34 21 404
Ellen Bara Stolzenberg United States 7 213 0.8× 115 1.1× 82 1.0× 38 1.0× 53 1.6× 12 416
Emily Forrest Cataldi United States 15 364 1.4× 84 0.8× 92 1.1× 33 0.8× 40 1.2× 22 483
Salleh Amat Malaysia 8 160 0.6× 102 1.0× 61 0.7× 14 0.4× 114 3.4× 104 399
Sally A. Dillow United States 6 226 0.9× 39 0.4× 102 1.2× 18 0.5× 44 1.3× 9 436
William T. Pink United States 12 407 1.6× 135 1.3× 176 2.1× 40 1.0× 51 1.5× 39 554
Carney Strange United States 10 186 0.7× 68 0.7× 32 0.4× 24 0.6× 29 0.9× 21 312
Cristóbal Salinas United States 9 273 1.0× 120 1.2× 221 2.7× 20 0.5× 48 1.4× 36 462
Georgianna L. Martin United States 13 358 1.4× 114 1.1× 131 1.6× 39 1.0× 33 1.0× 37 481
Scott C. Bauer United States 13 459 1.8× 124 1.2× 78 0.9× 14 0.4× 104 3.1× 37 648
Kathryn Bell McKenzie United States 13 659 2.5× 73 0.7× 239 2.9× 23 0.6× 48 1.4× 31 816

Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen M. Goodman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen M. Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen M. Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen M. Goodman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen M. Goodman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen M. Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen M. Goodman. The network helps show where Kathleen M. Goodman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen M. Goodman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen M. Goodman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen M. Goodman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen M. Goodman. Kathleen M. Goodman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Martin, Georgianna L., et al.. (2018). An Exploratory study of Institutional Characteristics, Fraternity and Sorority Membership, and Socially Responsible Leadership. College student affairs journal. 36(2). 155–170. 4 indexed citations
3.
Goodman, Kathleen M. & Darnell Cole. (2017). Using data-informed decision making to improve student affairs practice. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 1 indexed citations
4.
Goodman, Kathleen M.. (2017). The Effects of Viewpoint Diversity and Racial Diversity on Need for Cognition. Journal of college student development. 58(6). 853–871. 6 indexed citations
5.
Goodman, Kathleen M. & Nicholas A. Bowman. (2014). Making Diversity Work to Improve College Student Learning. New Directions for Student Services. 2014(147). 37–48. 8 indexed citations
6.
Goodman, Kathleen M.. (2014). Good Practices for Whom? A Vital Question for Understanding the First Year of College. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2013(160). 37–51. 4 indexed citations
7.
Stinson, Rebecca D., et al.. (2013). Do Atheism and Feminism Go Hand-in-Hand?: A Qualitative Investigation of Atheist Men’s Perspectives about Gender Equality. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(0). 39–39. 6 indexed citations
8.
Goodman, Kathleen M., Marcia B. Baxter Magolda, Tricia A. Seifert, & Patricia M. King. (2011). Good Practices for Student Learning: Mixed-Method Evidence from the Wabash National Study. About Campus Enriching the Student Learning Experience. 16(1). 2–9. 14 indexed citations
9.
Seifert, Tricia A., Kathleen M. Goodman, Patricia M. King, & Marcia B. Baxter Magolda. (2010). Using Mixed Methods to Study First-Year College Impact on Liberal Arts Learning Outcomes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 4(3). 248–267. 23 indexed citations
10.
Seifert, Tricia A., et al.. (2010). The importance of longitudinal pretest‐posttest designs in estimating college impact. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2010(S2). 5–16. 26 indexed citations
11.
Padgett, Ryan D., et al.. (2010). The impact of college student socialization, social class, and race on need for cognition. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2010(145). 99–111. 47 indexed citations
12.
Seifert, Tricia A., Ernest T. Pascarella, Kathleen M. Goodman, Mark H. Salisbury, & Charles Blaich. (2010). Liberal Arts Colleges and Good Practices in Undergraduate Education: Additional Evidence. Journal of college student development. 51(1). 1–22. 38 indexed citations
13.
Goodman, Kathleen M. & John A. Mueller. (2009). Atheist Students on Campus: From Misconceptions to Inclusion.. ˜The œchronicle of higher education. 55(21). 2 indexed citations
14.
Goodman, Kathleen M. & John A. Mueller. (2009). Invisible, marginalized, and stigmatized: Understanding and addressing the needs of atheist students. New Directions for Student Services. 2009(125). 55–63. 30 indexed citations
15.
Seifert, Tricia A., et al.. (2009). Methods for Assessing Inner Development: Spirituality andBeyond. Journal of College and Character. 10(7). 3 indexed citations
16.
Watt, Sherry K., et al.. (2009). Editors' notes. New Directions for Student Services. 2009(125). 1–3.
17.
Seifert, Tricia A., Kathleen M. Goodman, Nathan Lindsay, et al.. (2007). The Effects of Liberal Arts Experiences on Liberal Arts Outcomes. Research in Higher Education. 49(2). 107–125. 86 indexed citations
18.
Pascarella, Ernest T., et al.. (2007). College Student Binge Drinking and Academic Achievement: A Longitudinal Replication and Extension. Journal of college student development. 48(6). 715–727. 50 indexed citations
19.
Goodman, Kathleen M., et al.. (2006). First-Year Seminars Increase Persistence and Retention: A Summary of the Evidence from How College Affects Students. 8(3). 26. 43 indexed citations
20.
Sapon‐Shevin, Mara, et al.. (1998). Everyone Here Can Play.. Educational leadership. 56(1). 42–45. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ellen Bara Stolzenberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emily Forrest Cataldi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Salleh Amat Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sally A. Dillow Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by William T. Pink Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carney Strange Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cristóbal Salinas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Georgianna L. Martin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Scott C. Bauer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathryn Bell McKenzie
Rankless by CCL
2026