William T. Pink
- Education top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- George W. NoblitRobert L. CrainOliver C. MolesDelos H. KellyArthur A. HydeMary Ellen SweeneyKenneth PolkKathryn M. Borman
- Topics
- Education Systems and Policy (8 papers)Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (6 papers)Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William T. Pink
35 papers receiving 455 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Education 407
- Sociology and Political Science 176
- Social Psychology 135
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 83
- Clinical Psychology 51
Countries citing papers authored by William T. Pink
This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Pink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Pink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Pink more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Pink
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Pink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Pink. The network helps show where William T. Pink may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William T. Pink
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William T. Pink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William T. Pink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William T. Pink. William T. Pink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | Going Backstage: Enhancing Communicative Competence for Pre-Service Teachers. | 2 |
| 4 | Continuity and contradiction : the futures of the sociology of education | 27 |
| 5 | Effective Staff Development for School Change | 13 |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | Schooling in Social Context: Qualitative Studies | 22 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Introduction: An Issue on School Reform. | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | Rebellion and Success in the High School. | 6 |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | High School Dropout: An Analysis of Post-School Career Flows. | 1 |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About William T. Pink
William T. Pink is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Management and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 39 papers that have together received 554 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education Systems and Policy (8 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (6 papers) and Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (407 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (83 citations) and Social Psychology (135 citations). William T. Pink has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George W. Noblit, Robert L. Crain, Oliver C. Moles, Delos H. Kelly, Arthur A. Hyde, Mary Ellen Sweeney, Kenneth Polk, Kathryn M. Borman, David K. Wallace and L. Hermansen. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, British Journal of Sociology and Criminology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.