Karen L. Dodds
- Food Science top 2%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- James P. SmithAnne D. LambertA. H. W. HauschildDonald W. WarburtonM. Andrew JohnstonRóisín BurkeB. BlanchfieldBenjamin K. Simpson
- Topics
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (11 papers)Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers)Microbial Inactivation Methods (5 papers)
- Journals
- Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyInternational Journal of Food MicrobiologyMicrobiology
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Karen L. Dodds
25 papers receiving 662 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Food Science 345
- Animal Science and Zoology 263
- Biotechnology 238
- Molecular Biology 134
- Neurology 134
Countries citing papers authored by Karen L. Dodds
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen L. Dodds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen L. Dodds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen L. Dodds more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen L. Dodds
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen L. Dodds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen L. Dodds. The network helps show where Karen L. Dodds may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen L. Dodds
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen L. Dodds. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen L. Dodds based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen L. Dodds. Karen L. Dodds is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | Clostridium botulinum : ecology and control in foods | 168 |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 70 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 167 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | Botulism in Canada--summary for 1987. | 2 |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Karen L. Dodds
Karen L. Dodds is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Neurology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 741 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (11 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers) and Microbial Inactivation Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (238 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (263 citations) and Food Science (345 citations). Karen L. Dodds has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include James P. Smith, Anne D. Lambert, A. H. W. Hauschild, Donald W. Warburton, M. Andrew Johnston, Róisín Burke, B. Blanchfield, Benjamin K. Simpson, John W. Austin and M.V. Simpson. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, International Journal of Food Microbiology and Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.