This map shows the geographic impact of K. Kraan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Kraan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Kraan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Kraan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Kraan. The network helps show where K. Kraan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Kraan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Kraan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Kraan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with K. Kraan. K. Kraan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Venema, A., E.M.M. de Vroome, Gerben Hulsegge, et al.. (2020). Arbobalans 2020: Kwaliteit van de arbeid, effecten en maatregelen in Nederland [Quality of work, outcomes and measures in the Netherlands: summary]. TNO Repository.1 indexed citations
Oeij, P.R.A., S. Dhondt, K. Kraan, Robert Vergeer, & Frank Pot. (2012). Workplace innovation and its relations with organisational performance and employee commitment. TNO Repository.14 indexed citations
8.
Oeij, P.R.A., S. Dhondt, K. Kraan, Robert Vergeer, & Frank Pot. (2012). Workplace Innovation and its Relations with Organisational Performance and Employee Commitment - www-publicatie. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2012.3 indexed citations
9.
Oeij, P.R.A., S. Dhondt, K. Kraan, Robert Vergeer, & Frank Pot. (2012). Workplace innovation and its relations to performance and effects for employees. Lirias (KU Leuven). 4. 1–20.4 indexed citations
10.
Smulders, P.G.W., et al.. (2011). Telewerkers vormen een elite. TNO Repository. 96(4616). 493–495.5 indexed citations
11.
Kraan, K., et al.. (2011). Cohortstudie sociale innovatie (CSI) 2008-2010; Beschrijvingen steekproeven 1e, 2e, 3e meting. TNO Repository.1 indexed citations
12.
Kraan, K., et al.. (2009). Cohortstudie Sociale Innovatie (CSI) 2008-2010; Methodologie en beschrijving eerste meting (2008). TNO Repository.4 indexed citations
Kraan, K. & Catelijne Joling. (2008). Use of technology and working conditions in the European Union. TNO Repository.9 indexed citations
15.
Kraan, K., et al.. (2007). Arbeidsvoorwaarden en arbeidsverhoudingen op ondernemingsniveau : AVON monitor 2007. TNO Repository.2 indexed citations
16.
Oeij, P.R.A., et al.. (2006). One-size-fits-most: dialoog en maatwerk in huidige arbeidsrelaties. TNO Repository. 9(3). 6.2 indexed citations
17.
Nauta, Aukje, et al.. (2005). De invloed van functietype op het verband tussen leeftijd en inzetbaarheid. Gedrag & Organisatie. 18(6). 326.9 indexed citations
18.
Houtman, I.L.D., S. van den Bossche, K. Kraan, et al.. (2005). Gezondheidsschade en kosten als gevolg van RSI en psychosociale arbeidsbelasting in Nederland. TNO Repository.17 indexed citations
19.
Haan, Jos de, et al.. (2005). Verzonken technologie: ICT en de arbeidsmarkt. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).
20.
Dhondt, S., et al.. (2002). Work organisation, technology and working conditions. TNO Repository.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.