Julia M. Bristor
- Marketing top 2%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Museology top 1%
- Topics
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (5 papers)Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers)Higher Education Research Studies (4 papers)
- Cited by
- MarketingGender StudiesMuseology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaLatvia
In The Last Decade
Julia M. Bristor
16 papers receiving 490 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Marketing 287
- Gender Studies 275
- Sociology and Political Science 166
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 145
- Museology 72
Countries citing papers authored by Julia M. Bristor
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia M. Bristor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia M. Bristor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia M. Bristor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia M. Bristor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia M. Bristor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia M. Bristor. The network helps show where Julia M. Bristor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia M. Bristor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia M. Bristor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia M. Bristor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia M. Bristor. Julia M. Bristor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 119 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 55 | |
| 9 | A Chilly Campus Climate: One Woman's Story. | 1 |
| 10 | 211 | |
| 11 | Insider Versus Outsider: Reflections of a Feminist Consumer | 1 |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | Objectivity and Gender in Consumer Research: a Feminist Deconstructionist Critique | 3 |
| 14 | Enhanced explanations of word of mouth communications : The power of relations | 10 |
| 15 | Coalitions in Organizational Purchasing: an Application of Network Analysis | 4 |
| 16 | Buying Networks: a Model of Positional Influence in Organizational Buying. | 1 |
| 17 | Consumer Behavior From a Contemporary Philosophy of Science Perspective: an Organizational Framework | 3 |
About Julia M. Bristor
Julia M. Bristor is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Marketing and Conservation, having authored 17 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (287 citations), Gender Studies (275 citations) and Museology (72 citations). Julia M. Bristor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Eileen Fischer, Ronald J. Burke, J. Brock Smith and Mitchell G. Rothstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consumer Research, Psychology and Marketing and American Behavioral Scientist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.