Joseph Dimino

1.6k total citations
41 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Joseph Dimino is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Joseph Dimino has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Education, 23 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 13 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Joseph Dimino's work include Reading and Literacy Development (20 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (13 papers) and Education Systems and Policy (8 papers). Joseph Dimino is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (20 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (13 papers) and Education Systems and Policy (8 papers). Joseph Dimino collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Joseph Dimino's co-authors include Russell Gersten, Madhavi Jayanthi, Rebecca Newman-Gonchar, Scott Baker, Douglas Carnine, Lana Edwards Santoro, James S. Kim, Rhonda Griffiths, Robert M. Taylor and Diane Haager and has published in prestigious journals such as American Educational Research Journal, Reading Research Quarterly and Journal of Learning Disabilities.

In The Last Decade

Joseph Dimino

37 papers receiving 926 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joseph Dimino United States 17 714 700 251 147 94 41 1.1k
Erica S. Lembke United States 19 692 1.0× 691 1.0× 316 1.3× 143 1.0× 111 1.2× 72 1.1k
Evelyn S. Johnson United States 16 775 1.1× 605 0.9× 271 1.1× 217 1.5× 165 1.8× 74 1.2k
Jeanne Wanzek United States 17 843 1.2× 676 1.0× 215 0.9× 82 0.6× 45 0.5× 30 1.1k
Gina Biancarosa United States 17 830 1.2× 667 1.0× 207 0.8× 78 0.5× 38 0.4× 40 1.2k
Alysia D. Roehrig United States 16 503 0.7× 677 1.0× 105 0.4× 51 0.3× 130 1.4× 38 1.1k
Madhavi Jayanthi United States 17 568 0.8× 811 1.2× 459 1.8× 220 1.5× 189 2.0× 49 1.2k
Janis A. Bulgren United States 16 477 0.7× 554 0.8× 102 0.4× 191 1.3× 53 0.6× 43 819
B. Keith Lenz United States 21 853 1.2× 793 1.1× 321 1.3× 342 2.3× 158 1.7× 54 1.4k
Anne McGill‐Franzen United States 17 563 0.8× 785 1.1× 89 0.4× 80 0.5× 57 0.6× 37 992
Hank Fien United States 22 905 1.3× 934 1.3× 747 3.0× 120 0.8× 61 0.6× 81 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Dimino

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Dimino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Dimino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Dimino more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Dimino

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Dimino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Dimino. The network helps show where Joseph Dimino may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Dimino

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Dimino. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Dimino based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Dimino. Joseph Dimino is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gersten, Russell, et al.. (2024). Conceptual Replications of the Teacher Study Group Approach to Professional Development in Vocabulary. The Elementary School Journal. 124(4). 669–692.
2.
Jayanthi, Madhavi, et al.. (2024). Infusing Evidence-Based Instruction in Two Middle School Settings. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 39(2). 101–112. 2 indexed citations
3.
Hitchcock, John H., et al.. (2020). Evaluating the collaborative strategic reading intervention: An overview of randomized controlled trial options. Practical assessment, research & evaluation. 14(2). 2. 6 indexed citations
4.
Foorman, Barbara R., Nicholas Beyler, Michael D. Coyne, et al.. (2016). Foundational Skills to Support Reading for Understanding in Kindergarten through 3rd Grade. Educator's Practice Guide. NCEE 2016-4008.. 15 indexed citations
5.
Rolfhus, Eric, et al.. (2013). From Efficacy Trial to Large Scale Effectiveness Trial: A Tier 2 Mathematics Intervention for First Graders with Difficulties in Mathematics.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 1 indexed citations
6.
Rolfhus, Eric, et al.. (2012). An Evaluation of "Number Rockets": A Tier-2 Intervention for Grade 1 Students at Risk for Difficulties in Mathematics. Final Report. NCEE 2012-4007.. 2 indexed citations
7.
Hitchcock, John H., et al.. (2011). The Impact of Collaborative Strategic Reading on the Reading Comprehension of Grade 5 Students in Linguistically Diverse Schools. Final Report. NCEE 2011-4001.. 5 indexed citations
8.
James‐Burdumy, Susanne, John Deke, Julieta Lugo‐Gil, et al.. (2010). Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Findings from Two Student Cohorts. NCEE 2010-4015.. 14 indexed citations
9.
James‐Burdumy, Susanne, Wendy Mansfield, John Deke, et al.. (2009). Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Impacts on a First Cohort of Fifth-Grade Students. NCEE 2009-4032.. 17 indexed citations
10.
James‐Burdumy, Susanne, Wendy Mansfield, John Deke, et al.. (2009). Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Impacts on a First Cohort of Fifth-Grade Students. Mathematica Policy Research Reports. 19 indexed citations
11.
Brownell, Mary T., Anne G. Bishop, Russell Gersten, et al.. (2009). The Role of Domain Expertise in Beginning Special Education Teacher Quality. Exceptional Children. 75(4). 391–411. 89 indexed citations
12.
James‐Burdumy, Susanne, David Myers, John Deke, et al.. (2006). The National Evaluation of Reading Comprehension Interventions: Design Report. Final Report.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports. 1 indexed citations
13.
Gersten, Russell & Joseph Dimino. (2006). RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly. 41(1). 99–108. 123 indexed citations
14.
Baker, Scott, Russell Gersten, Joseph Dimino, & Rhonda Griffiths. (2004). The Sustained Use of Research-Based Instructional Practice. Remedial and Special Education. 25(1). 5–24. 61 indexed citations
15.
Dimino, Joseph, Robert M. Taylor, & Russell Gersten. (1995). SYNTHESIS OF THE RESEARCH ON STORY GRAMMAR AS A MEANS TO INCREASE COMPREHENSION. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 11(1). 53–72. 41 indexed citations
16.
Gersten, Russell & Joseph Dimino. (1990). Reading Instruction for At-Risk Students: Implications of Current Research.. 33(5). 2 indexed citations
17.
Gersten, Russell & Joseph Dimino. (1990). Visions and Revisions: A Perspective on the Whole Language Controversy.. 2 indexed citations
18.
Dimino, Joseph, et al.. (1990). Story Grammar: An Approach for Promoting At-Risk Secondary Students' Comprehension of Literature. The Elementary School Journal. 91(1). 19–32. 66 indexed citations
19.
Gersten, Russell, et al.. (1990). Story Grammar. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 23(6). 335–342. 47 indexed citations
20.
Gersten, Russell & Joseph Dimino. (1989). Teaching Literature to At-Risk Students.. Educational leadership. 46(5). 53–57. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026