Thomas F. Gilbert

23 papers receiving 717 citations

Hit Papers

Human competence—engineering worthy performance19782026199420101978200400600

Peers

Thomas F. Gilbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 262
  • Applied Psychology 198
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 142
  • Social Psychology 141
  • Education 137
Replace Robert J. Wherry with:
Robert J. Wherry United States
James A. Earles United States
Allison Rossett United States
Sidney J. Parnes United States
George B. Forsythe United States
John Wedman United States
José Navarro Spain
Siu L. Chow Canada
Samuel T. McAbee United States
Sallie E. Gordon United States
Thomas F. Gilbert relative to Robert J. Wherry United States Robert J. Wherry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Robert J. Wherry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. Gilbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. Gilbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. Gilbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. Gilbert. The network helps show where Thomas F. Gilbert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. Gilbert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. Gilbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. Gilbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. Gilbert. Thomas F. Gilbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 11
2 1
3 39
4 9
5
What Skinner Gave Us.
2
6 21
7 2
8 2
9 1
10 4
11
Guiding Worthy Performance.
3
12
The High Cost of Knowledge.
2
13 1
14 16
15 1
16 2
17 70
18 16
19 14
20 33

About Thomas F. Gilbert

Thomas F. Gilbert is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Applied Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 957 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (198 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (262 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (142 citations). Thomas F. Gilbert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Italy. Frequent co-authors include William James, K. D. DUNCAN, Maurizio A. Spirito, Claudio Pastrone, Maria Teresa Outeiro, Alexandre Alapetite, Peter Rosengren, Dario Bonino and Marco Jahn. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and British Journal of Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026