John Pennington
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 3
- Themes in Literature Analysis 2
- Joseph Conrad and Literature 1
-
- Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Thomas W. Britt (2 shared papers)Barry R. Schlenker (2 shared papers)Kevin Doherty (1 shared paper)et al (1 shared paper)Robert E. Boyer (1 shared paper)John Grady (1 shared paper)Coralie Mills (1 shared paper)Peter Skidmore (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Extrapolation (3 papers)Psychological Review (2 papers)The Lion and the unicorn (1 paper)Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (1 paper)Marvels & Tales (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Pennington
8 papers receiving 395 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 105
- Applied Psychology 42
- Information Systems and Management 45
- Social Psychology 121
- Public Administration 20
Countries citing papers authored by John Pennington
This map shows the geographic impact of John Pennington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pennington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pennington more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Pennington
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pennington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pennington. The network helps show where John Pennington may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside John Pennington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 397 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 22 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 11 | The Not-So-Light Princess: Tori Amos and Samuel Adamson’s Reimagining of George MacDonald’s Classic Fairy Tale | 2015 | 0 |
| 12 | Of “Frustrate Desire”: Feminist Self-Postponement in George MacDonald’s Lilith | 2002 | 0 |
About John Pennington
John Pennington is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Paleontology and Social Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (1 paper), Political Science Research and Education (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Joseph Conrad and Literature (1 paper), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (105 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations), Information Systems and Management (45 citations), Social Psychology (121 citations) and Public Administration (20 citations). John Pennington has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas W. Britt, Barry R. Schlenker, Kevin Doherty, et al, Robert E. Boyer, John Grady, Coralie Mills, Peter Skidmore, Finbar McCormick and Richard Fawcett. Their work appears in journals such as Extrapolation, Psychological Review, The Lion and the unicorn, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Marvels & Tales.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.