Extrapolation

602 papers and 965 indexed citations

About

The 602 papers published in Extrapolation in the last decades have received a total of 965 indexed citations. Papers published in Extrapolation usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (207 papers), Philosophy (150 papers) and Cultural Studies (101 papers) specifically the topics of Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (124 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (80 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Extrapolation are Lyman Tower Sargent, Gerry Canavan, Darko Suvin, Grace L. Dillon, Brian Wilson Aldiss, Karen Hellekson, Frances Smith Foster, Mark McCarthy, Carl Freedman and André Brock.

In The Last Decade

Extrapolation

220 papers receiving 425 citations

Fields of papers published in Extrapolation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Extrapolation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Extrapolation.

Countries where authors publish in Extrapolation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Extrapolation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Extrapolation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Extrapolation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026