Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Elementary School Social Climate and School Achievement
1978346 citationsWilbur B. Brookover, John H. Schweitzer et al.American Educational Research Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by John H. Schweitzer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Schweitzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Schweitzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Schweitzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Schweitzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Schweitzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Schweitzer. The network helps show where John H. Schweitzer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Schweitzer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Schweitzer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Schweitzer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Schweitzer. John H. Schweitzer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Doberneck, Diane M. & John H. Schweitzer. (2017). Disciplinary variations in publicly engaged scholarship: An analysis using the Biglan classification of academic disciplines. Journal of higher education outreach & engagement. 21(1). 78–103.16 indexed citations
2.
Root‐Bernstein, Robert, et al.. (2013). Arts and Crafts. Economic Development Quarterly. 27(3). 221–229.32 indexed citations
3.
Schweitzer, John H., et al.. (2012). Factors Affecting Seasonal Walkability in a Cold Climate Community: A Case Study of East Lansing, Michigan, in Collaboration with Michigan State University. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.6 indexed citations
4.
Doberneck, Diane M., et al.. (2012). Sometimes There are No Notes: An Auto Ethnographic Essay of a Collaboration at the Engagement Interface. Journal of higher education outreach & engagement. 16(3). 57–86.
5.
Glass, Chris R., Diane M. Doberneck, & John H. Schweitzer. (2011). Unpacking Faculty Engagement: The Types of Activities Faculty Members Report as Publicly Engaged Scholarship During Promotion and Tenure. Journal of higher education outreach & engagement. 15(1). 7–30.36 indexed citations
Doberneck, Diane M., Chris R. Glass, & John H. Schweitzer. (2010). From Rhetoric to Reality: A Typology of Publically Engaged Scholarship.. Journal of higher education outreach & engagement. 14(4). 5–35.32 indexed citations
8.
Doberneck, Diane M., Chris R. Glass, & John H. Schweitzer. (2009). Scholarly Outreach and Engagement Reported by Successfully Tenured Faculty at Michigan State University, 2002-2006.2 indexed citations
Brookover, Wilbur B., et al.. (1978). Elementary School Social Climate and School Achievement. American Educational Research Journal. 15(2). 301–318.346 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.