Countries citing papers authored by John G. Mooney
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Mooney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Mooney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Mooney more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Mooney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Mooney. The network helps show where John G. Mooney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John G. Mooney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John G. Mooney.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John G. Mooney based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John G. Mooney. John G. Mooney is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lynn, Theo, John G. Mooney, Brian Lee, & Patrícia Takako Endo. (2020). The Cloud-to-Thing Continuum. Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation).18 indexed citations
Fox, Grace, et al.. (2018). Towards an Understanding of Farmers' Mobile Technology Adoption: A Comparison of Adoption and Continuance Intentions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.5 indexed citations
6.
Fox, Grace, et al.. (2018). Communicating Compliance: Developing a GDPR Privacy Label.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.9 indexed citations
Whitley, Edgar A., et al.. (2013). The shift to cloud computing: a slow train comin’?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
10.
Johnson, Eric N., et al.. (2013). Fourteen Years of Autonomous Rotorcraft Research at the Georgia Institute of Technology. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology). 229–238.2 indexed citations
11.
Mooney, John G., David Salisbury, Andrew Schwarz, et al.. (2012). Reflect and Redefine: Deans’ Perspectives on the Positioning of IS within the Business School. Civil War Book Review. 3165–3167.1 indexed citations
Mooney, John G., Mark Chun, Anat Hovav, Joey F. George, & Charla Griffy‐Brown. (2005). Are Prevailing Theories and Practices of IS Security Management Adequate? An Evaluation and Call to Action. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 400.2 indexed citations
Tallon, Paul P., Kenneth L. Kraemer, Viijay Gurbaxani, & John G. Mooney. (1996). A Multi-dimensional Assessment of the Contribution of Information Technology to Firm Performance.. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 846–867.7 indexed citations
Mooney, John G., Viijay Gurbaxani, & Kenneth L. Kraemer. (1995). A Process Oriented Framework for Assessing the Business Value of Information Technology - eScholarship.1 indexed citations
19.
Kraemer, Kenneth L., et al.. (1994). The Business Value of Information Technology in Corporations. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
20.
Nierstrasz, Oscar, et al.. (1983). Using Objects to Implement Office Procedures.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.