Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service
20101.1k citationsMichael Goul, Haluk Demirkan et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Goul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Goul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Goul more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Goul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Goul. The network helps show where Michael Goul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Goul
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Goul.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Goul based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Goul. Michael Goul is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mandviwalla, Munir, et al.. (2015). Achieving Academic-Industry Collaboration with Departmental Advisory Boards. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 14(1). 17–37.8 indexed citations
Wixom, Barbara H., et al.. (2011). The Current State of Business Intelligence in Academia. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 29(1). 1.1 indexed citations
10.
Dinter, Barbara & Michael Goul. (2010). The impact of national culture on business intelligence maturity models. International Conference on Information Systems. 255.2 indexed citations
11.
Goul, Michael. (2010). Business Intelligence at the crossroads: Convergence or confusion ahead?. Information Technology Interfaces. 21–28.3 indexed citations
12.
Keith, Mark, Haluk Demirkan, & Michael Goul. (2009). Service-Oriented Software Development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 100.4 indexed citations
Goul, Michael, et al.. (2005). A Vector Based, Content Analytic Methodology for Comparing Negotiated IT Service Level Agreements. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 425.2 indexed citations
15.
Goul, Michael, et al.. (2003). Towards Web Services Standards for Fault Tolerance Capabilities in Inter-organizational Workflow Management Systems.. 90–96.6 indexed citations
Goul, Michael, et al.. (1997). Merging Accountancy and Computer Information Systems Programs at Arizona State University:A Snapshot of Current Progress and Continuing Challenges. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.