Information & Management

2.9k papers and 182.9k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Information & Management in the last decades have received a total of 182.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Information & Management usually cover Sociology and Political Science (939 papers), Information Systems and Management (920 papers) and Management Information Systems (838 papers) specifically the topics of Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (883 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (584 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (449 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information & Management are Young‐Gul Kim, Patrick Y.K. Chau, Chitu Okoli, Suzanne D. Pawlowski, Chin‐Lung Hsu, Ji-Won Moon, Prashant Palvia, William R. King, Jen‐Her Wu and Hans van der Heijden.

In The Last Decade

Information & Management

2.7k papers receiving 162.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Information & Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information & Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information & Management.

Countries where authors publish in Information & Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information & Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information & Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information & Management more than expected).

The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applica... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2.8k
  1. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications (2004)
  2. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model (2002)
  3. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context (2001)
  4. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model (2006)
  5. What drives mobile commerce? (2004)
  6. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience (2003)
  7. How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research (2019)
  8. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)
  9. AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment (2002)
  10. The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective (2002)
  11. Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance (2021)
  12. Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities (2019)
  13. Motivating IS security compliance: Insights from Habit and Protection Motivation Theory (2012)
  14. Do you get tired of socializing? An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services (2016)
  15. Role of big data management in enhancing big data decision-making capability and quality among Chinese firms: A dynamic capabilities view (2018)
  16. Measuring information output: A communication systems approach (1978)
  17. Global corporate web sites: an empirical investigation of content and design (2002)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026