Joanna Bates

2.5k citations
66 papers · 1.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Joanna Bates

66 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Joanna Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Family Practice 174
  • Emergency Medical Services 316
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.1k
  • General Health Professions 692
  • Gender Studies 231
Replace Jeanne M. Farnan with:
Jeanne M. Farnan United States
Susan E. Skochelak United States
Rachel B. Levine United States
Rajesh S. Mangrulkar United States
Michael Fordis United States
Christopher M. Wittich United States
Debra A. DaRosa United States
Monica L. Lypson United States
John Q. Young United States
Jane Kidd United Kingdom
Joanna Bates relative to Jeanne M. Farnan United States Jeanne M. Farnan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jeanne M. Farnan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joanna Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanna Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanna Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanna Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanna Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanna Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanna Bates. The network helps show where Joanna Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joanna Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joanna Bates Line = papers co-authored together Joanna Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013115
2 2016105
3 201696
4 200493
5 200789
6 200384
7
A physician peer support writing group.
200363
8 201861
9 200161
10 201461
11 200656
12 201750
13 200548
14 201741
15 200540
16 200834
17 201632
18 202130
19 201130
20 201830

About Joanna Bates

Joanna Bates is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Gender Studies and Family Practice, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (22 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (19 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (11 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (10 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (10 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (8 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (174 citations), Emergency Medical Services (316 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.1k citations), General Health Professions (692 citations) and Gender Studies (231 citations). Joanna Bates has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Ellaway, Scott A. Lear, David Snadden, Francis Lau, Andrew Ignaszewski, Jill Konkin, Pim W. Teunissen, Sarah Dobson, Christopher Watling and Richard Hays. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Academic Medicine, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Medical Teacher and Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact