Janice E. J. Woodrow
- Education top 2%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Erminia PedrettiJolie Mayer‐Smith
- Topics
- Gender and Technology in Education (10 papers)Child Development and Digital Technology (8 papers)Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Janice E. J. Woodrow
21 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Education 464
- Gender Studies 381
- Sociology and Political Science 179
- Information Systems 119
- Information Systems and Management 92
Countries citing papers authored by Janice E. J. Woodrow
This map shows the geographic impact of Janice E. J. Woodrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice E. J. Woodrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice E. J. Woodrow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janice E. J. Woodrow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice E. J. Woodrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice E. J. Woodrow. The network helps show where Janice E. J. Woodrow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice E. J. Woodrow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice E. J. Woodrow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice E. J. Woodrow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice E. J. Woodrow. Janice E. J. Woodrow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | Self Monitoring: A Study of Student Interactive Assessment | 0 |
| 4 | Teaming technology enhanced instruction in the science classroom and teacher professional development | 18 |
| 5 | Technology-enhanced instruction: a perspective from experience | 3 |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | A Computer-Based, Multimedia Science Education Course | 4 |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | Computer-generated learning resources | 2 |
| 12 | 106 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | Teachers' knowledge of educational applications of computers | 5 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Educators' Attitudes and Predispositions towards Computers. | 23 |
| 20 | 5 |
About Janice E. J. Woodrow
Janice E. J. Woodrow is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender and Technology in Education (10 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (8 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (381 citations), Education (464 citations) and Information Systems and Management (92 citations). Janice E. J. Woodrow has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Erminia Pedretti and Jolie Mayer‐Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Computers & Education and Science Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.