Janet Kleber
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Safety Research top 10%
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Co-authors
- Stephan DickertPaul SlovicDaniel VästfjällArnd FlorackEllen PetersRalf RummerJudith SchweppeTilmann Betsch
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers)Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Janet Kleber
13 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Sociology and Political Science 127
- Social Psychology 79
- Cognitive Neuroscience 78
- Safety Research 60
- General Decision Sciences 52
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Kleber
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Kleber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Kleber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Kleber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Kleber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Kleber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Kleber. The network helps show where Janet Kleber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Kleber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Kleber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Kleber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Kleber. Janet Kleber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | Big Picnic: Big Questions - Engaging the public with Responsible Research and Innovation on Food Security | 1 |
| 6 | 53 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | How Store Employees Influence Consumer Choice Under Retail Crowding – a Social Overload Perspective | 4 |
| 9 | 45 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | The Moderating Role of Numeracy in the Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing | 1 |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 16 |
About Janet Kleber
Janet Kleber is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 18 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (52 citations), Safety Research (60 citations) and Applied Psychology (34 citations). Janet Kleber has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephan Dickert, Paul Slovic, Daniel Västfjäll, Arnd Florack, Ellen Peters, Ralf Rummer, Judith Schweppe, Tilmann Betsch, Christoph Engel and Corina Ulshöfer. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.