David Faro
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Marketing top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Co-authors
- Katherine A. BursonRobert W. SmithSimona BottiYuval RottenstreichReid HastieAnn L. McGillFrance LeclercLauren Block
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (13 papers)Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
David Faro
16 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Sociology and Political Science 117
- Marketing 92
- Social Psychology 89
- Cognitive Neuroscience 87
- General Decision Sciences 80
Countries citing papers authored by David Faro
This map shows the geographic impact of David Faro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Faro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Faro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Faro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Faro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Faro. The network helps show where David Faro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Faro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Faro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Faro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Faro. David Faro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 133 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | ABC’s of Principal-Agent Interactions: Accurate Predictions, Biased Processes, and Contrasts between Working and Delegating | 3 |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | How Long Did That Take? the Role of Causal Attribution in Estimating Elapsed Time | 0 |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 19 |
About David Faro
David Faro is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Applied Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (13 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (80 citations), Applied Psychology (79 citations) and Marketing (92 citations). David Faro has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Katherine A. Burson, Robert W. Smith, Simona Botti, Yuval Rottenstreich, Reid Hastie, Ann L. McGill, France Leclerc, Lauren Block and Stefano Puntoni. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Management Science and Journal of Consumer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.