Ellen Peters

32.7k total citations · 7 hit papers
216 papers, 16.7k citations indexed

About

Ellen Peters is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ellen Peters has authored 216 papers receiving a total of 16.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 70 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 54 papers in General Health Professions and 54 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ellen Peters's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (46 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (44 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (38 papers). Ellen Peters is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (46 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (44 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (38 papers). Ellen Peters collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Ellen Peters's co-authors include Paul Slovic, Judith H. Hibbard, Melissa L. Finucane, C. K. Mertz, Daniel Västfjäll, Donald G. MacGregor, Dan M. Kahan, Nathan F. Dieckmann, Donald Braman and Gregory N. Mandel and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and JAMA.

In The Last Decade

Ellen Peters

210 papers receiving 15.8k citations

Hit Papers

The Polarizing Impact of Science Litera... 1996 2026 2006 2016 2012 2006 2006 2006 1996 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ellen Peters United States 65 6.0k 3.1k 2.5k 2.4k 2.0k 216 16.7k
Neil D. Weinstein United States 61 6.7k 1.1× 3.4k 1.1× 7.8k 3.1× 1.8k 0.7× 1.5k 0.7× 98 21.8k
Baruch Fischhoff United States 85 12.9k 2.1× 2.4k 0.8× 3.0k 1.2× 6.9k 2.8× 4.7k 2.3× 401 33.2k
Jon A. Krosnick United States 80 12.7k 2.1× 1.2k 0.4× 1.8k 0.7× 630 0.3× 2.6k 1.3× 203 22.9k
Noah J. Goldstein United States 30 5.0k 0.8× 1.1k 0.4× 2.3k 0.9× 522 0.2× 1.3k 0.7× 73 13.1k
Elke U. Weber United States 64 7.8k 1.3× 690 0.2× 3.5k 1.4× 5.3k 2.2× 3.6k 1.8× 238 21.7k
Alexander J. Rothman United States 57 3.8k 0.6× 2.8k 0.9× 6.0k 2.4× 554 0.2× 622 0.3× 201 14.8k
Duane T. Wegener United States 42 6.2k 1.0× 1.2k 0.4× 2.5k 1.0× 826 0.3× 698 0.3× 135 17.4k
Ralph Hertwig Germany 63 3.8k 0.6× 719 0.2× 1.9k 0.8× 6.4k 2.6× 2.9k 1.4× 301 16.0k
Eldar Shafir United States 39 2.5k 0.4× 1.1k 0.4× 1.2k 0.5× 2.9k 1.2× 3.0k 1.5× 95 11.4k
Paschal Sheeran United Kingdom 70 6.5k 1.1× 3.3k 1.1× 10.7k 4.3× 848 0.3× 753 0.4× 201 22.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Peters. The network helps show where Ellen Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen Peters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen Peters. Ellen Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Chapman, Daniel & Ellen Peters. (2024). Examining the (non-linear) relationships between climate change anxiety, information seeking, and pro-environmental behavioral intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 99. 102440–102440. 10 indexed citations
3.
Fish, Carolyn, et al.. (2024). Using Geovisualizations to Educate the Public About Environmental Health Hazards: What Works and Why. Current Environmental Health Reports. 11(4). 453–467. 1 indexed citations
4.
Chapman, Daniel, et al.. (2024). Motivating parents to protect their children from wildfire smoke: the impact of air quality index infographics. Environmental Research Communications. 6(7). 75001–75001. 3 indexed citations
5.
Peters, Ellen, et al.. (2023). Poster Abstracts. HIV Medicine. 24(S3). 21–106.
6.
Silverstein, Michael, Pär Bjälkebring, Brittany Shoots‐Reinhard, & Ellen Peters. (2023). The numeric understanding measures: Developing and validating adaptive and nonadaptive numeracy scales. Judgment and Decision Making. 18. 1 indexed citations
7.
Philipsborn, Rebecca, et al.. (2023). Educating families about the impacts of wildfire smoke on children’s health: opportunities for healthcare professionals. BMJ Paediatrics Open. 7(1). e002187–e002187. 6 indexed citations
8.
Peters, Ellen, et al.. (2022). Large numbers cause magnitude neglect: The case of government expenditures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(28). e2203037119–e2203037119. 9 indexed citations
9.
Shoots‐Reinhard, Brittany, et al.. (2022). Greater objective numeracy protects COVID-19 pandemic grades but endangers academic interest.. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 8(4). 315–329. 3 indexed citations
10.
Trevena, Lyndal, Carissa Bonner, Yasmina Okan, et al.. (2021). Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts. Medical Decision Making. 41(7). 834–847. 73 indexed citations
11.
Nowell, W. Benjamin, Shilpa Venkatachalam, Christine E. Stake, et al.. (2020). Identifying patient decisions and related information needs during decision making related to total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 9(16). 1153–1166. 10 indexed citations
12.
Berman, Micah L., Michael Byron, Eric N. Lindblom, et al.. (2017). Communicating Tobacco Product Information to the Public.. PubMed. 72(3). 386–405. 9 indexed citations
13.
Gregory, Robin, Ellen Peters, & Paul Slovic. (2011). Making decisions about prescription drugs: A study of doctor–patient communication. Health Risk & Society. 13(4). 347–371. 13 indexed citations
14.
Slovic, Paul & Ellen Peters. (2010). Risk Perception and Affect. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
15.
Greene, Jessica & Ellen Peters. (2009). Medicaid consumers and informed decisionmaking.. PubMed. 30(3). 25–40. 25 indexed citations
16.
Västfjäll, Daniel, Ellen Peters, & Paul Slovic. (2008). Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster. Judgment and Decision Making. 3(1). 64–72. 80 indexed citations
17.
Greene, Jessica, Ellen Peters, C. K. Mertz, & Judith H. Hibbard. (2008). Comprehension and choice of a consumer-directed health plan: an experimental study.. PubMed. 14(6). 369–76. 36 indexed citations
18.
Västfjäll, Daniel, Ellen Peters, & Paul Slovic. (2008). Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster. Judgment and Decision Making. 3(1). 64–72. 75 indexed citations
19.
Peters, Ellen, Paul Slovic, Daniel Västfjäll, & C. K. Mertz. (2008). Intuitive numbers guide decisions. Judgment and Decision Making. 3(8). 619–635. 73 indexed citations
20.
Peters, Ellen & Paul Slovic. (2007). Affective Asynchrony and the Measurement of the Affective Attitude Component. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026