James G. Field

2.4k total citations · 3 hit papers
15 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

James G. Field is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, James G. Field has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in James G. Field's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers). James G. Field is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers). James G. Field collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. James G. Field's co-authors include Frank A. Bosco, Charles A. Pierce, Herman Aguinis, Kulraj Singh, Andrew Bennett, Arnold B. Bakker, Gavin R. Slemp, Frederick L. Oswald, Dan R. Dalton and Ronald S. Landis and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Applied Psychology.

In The Last Decade

James G. Field

13 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Correlational effect size benchmarks.

2014 560 citations Frank A. Bosco, Herman Aguinis et al. Journal of Applied Psychology profile →
Recovery from work‐related effort: A meta‐analysis

2017 276 citations Andrew Bennett, Arnold B. Bakker et al. Journal of Organizational Behavior profile →
Interpersonal supports for basic psychological needs and their relations with motivation, well-being, and performance: A meta-analysis.

2024 55 citations Gavin R. Slemp, James G. Field et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James G. Field United States	10	444	425	295	192	189	15	1.3k
Dan J. Putka United States	15	383 0.9×	418 1.0×	192 0.7×	171 0.9×	68 0.4×	32	1.3k
James C. Beaty United States	8	356 0.8×	406 1.0×	347 1.2×	286 1.5×	87 0.5×	9	1.3k
Brian G. Whitaker United States	13	367 0.8×	458 1.1×	292 1.0×	329 1.7×	52 0.3×	30	1.2k
Gillian Yeo Australia	21	765 1.7×	635 1.5×	302 1.0×	238 1.2×	131 0.7×	37	1.8k
Lorne M. Sulsky Canada	21	425 1.0×	437 1.0×	351 1.2×	165 0.9×	52 0.3×	41	1.5k
Scott Snook United States	12	393 0.9×	282 0.7×	216 0.7×	187 1.0×	71 0.4×	23	1.4k
Justin A. DeSimone United States	13	329 0.7×	265 0.6×	402 1.4×	247 1.3×	71 0.4×	32	1.2k
Jessica Keeney United States	8	530 1.2×	441 1.0×	613 2.1×	253 1.3×	172 0.9×	9	1.5k
Jennifer L. Kisamore United States	16	411 0.9×	360 0.8×	355 1.2×	311 1.6×	111 0.6×	29	1.4k
Steven E. Scullen United States	14	408 0.9×	559 1.3×	262 0.9×	279 1.5×	69 0.4×	19	1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by James G. Field

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James G. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James G. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James G. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James G. Field

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James G. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James G. Field. The network helps show where James G. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James G. Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James G. Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James G. Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James G. Field. James G. Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Field, James G., et al.. (2025). 3 in 1: Manifestations of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2B on Imaging. JCEM Case Reports. 3(2). luaf004–luaf004.

Slemp, Gavin R., et al.. (2024). Interpersonal supports for basic psychological needs and their relations with motivation, well-being, and performance: A meta-analysis.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 127(5). 1012–1037. 55 indexed citations breakdown →

Field, James G., et al.. (2021). Many forces at play: Ethical dilemmas in academic research. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 14(3). 360–366.

Field, James G., et al.. (2021). More alike than different? A comparison of variance explained by cross-cultural models. Journal of International Business Studies. 52(9). 1797–1817. 19 indexed citations

Field, James G., Frank A. Bosco, & Sven Kepes. (2020). How robust is our cumulative knowledge on turnover?. Journal of Business and Psychology. 36(3). 349–365. 27 indexed citations

Slemp, Gavin R., et al.. (2020). A meta-analysis of autonomous and controlled forms of teacher motivation. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 121. 103459–103459. 103 indexed citations

Bosco, Frank A., et al.. (2019). Advancing Meta-Analysis With Knowledge-Management Platforms: Using metaBUS in Psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 3(1). 124–137. 16 indexed citations

Field, James G., et al.. (2018). Introducing a Comprehensive Sensitivity Analysis Tool for Meta-Analytic Reviews. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2018(1). 18291–18291. 5 indexed citations

Banks, George C., James G. Field, Frederick L. Oswald, et al.. (2018). Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices. Journal of Business and Psychology. 34(3). 257–270. 95 indexed citations

10.

Bennett, Andrew, Arnold B. Bakker, & James G. Field. (2017). Recovery from work‐related effort: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 39(3). 262–275. 276 indexed citations breakdown →

11.

Field, James G., et al.. (2015). An Examination of the Funding-Finding Relation in the Field of Management. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015(1). 17463–17463. 2 indexed citations

12.

Bosco, Frank A., Piers Steel, Frederick L. Oswald, Krista L. Uggerslev, & James G. Field. (2015). Cloud-based Meta-analysis to Bridge Science and Practice: Welcome to metaBUS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 33 indexed citations

13.

Bosco, Frank A., Herman Aguinis, James G. Field, Charles A. Pierce, & Dan R. Dalton. (2015). HARKing's Threat to Organizational Research: Evidence From Primary and Meta‐Analytic Sources. Personnel Psychology. 69(3). 709–750. 93 indexed citations

14.

Bosco, Frank A., Herman Aguinis, Kulraj Singh, James G. Field, & Charles A. Pierce. (2014). Correlational effect size benchmarks.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 100(2). 431–449. 560 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

Bosco, Frank A., Kulraj Singh, James G. Field, & Charles A. Pierce. (2013). Effect-Size Magnitude Benchmarks: Implications for Scientific Progress and Statistical Inferences. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2013(1). 16542–16542. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact