James E. Bray

62 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

MLST revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics 2013 · 487 citations
4872013202620172021100200300400

Peers

James E. Bray
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Microbiology 348
  • Molecular Medicine 209
  • Endocrinology 170
  • Molecular Biology 1.9k
  • Food Science 342
Replace Matthew W. Frank with:
Matthew W. Frank United States
Ulrike Mäder Germany
Nathaniel I. Martin Netherlands
Bruce L. Geller United States
Alberto Marina Spain
Konstantinos Beis United Kingdom
N Qureshi United States
Lothar Jänsch Germany
Carlos Contreras‐Martel France
Vincent Villeret France
James E. Bray relative to Matthew W. Frank United States Matthew W. Frank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Matthew W. Frank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Bray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Bray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Bray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Bray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Bray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Bray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Bray. The network helps show where James E. Bray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Bray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Bray Line = papers co-authored together James E. Bray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
MLST revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics
Hit paper breakdown →
2013487
2 2008323
3 2007263
4 2010241
5 1984147
6 2011140
7 1999138
8 1999101
9 201791
10 200881
11 199972
12 200269
13 200049
14 201549
15 201544
16 201443
17 201743
18 200241
19 201740
20 200536

About James E. Bray

James E. Bray is a scholar working on Microbiology, Molecular Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry, Epidemiology and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (16 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (15 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (14 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (9 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (9 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (7 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (7 papers) and Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (348 citations), Molecular Medicine (209 citations), Endocrinology (170 citations), Molecular Biology (1.9k citations) and Food Science (342 citations). James E. Bray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Martin Maiden, Keith A. Jolley, Noel McCarthy, Christine Orengo, Udo Oppermann, Melissa J. Jansen van Rensburg, Sarah G. Earle, Suzanne A. Ford, Brian D. Marsden and Janet M. Thornton. Their work appears in journals such as Microbial Genomics, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Chemico-Biological Interactions, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026