Angelo D. Favia

2.1k total citations
29 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Angelo D. Favia is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Genetics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Angelo D. Favia has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 10 papers in Genetics and 8 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Angelo D. Favia's work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (10 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (7 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (5 papers). Angelo D. Favia is often cited by papers focused on Computational Drug Discovery Methods (10 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (7 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (5 papers). Angelo D. Favia collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Germany. Angelo D. Favia's co-authors include Janet M. Thornton, Irene Nobeli, Andrea Cavalli, Angelo Carotti, Francesco Leonetti, Maurizio Recanatini, Giovanni Bottegoni, Edmund Maser, Orazio Nicolotti and Rolf W. Hartmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Nature Biotechnology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Angelo D. Favia

27 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Angelo D. Favia United Kingdom	17	925	413	400	368	218	29	1.7k
Tuomo Laitinen Finland	26	970 1.0×	193 0.5×	354 0.9×	278 0.8×	82 0.4×	90	1.8k
Sonia Lobo Planey United States	15	807 0.9×	281 0.7×	297 0.7×	103 0.3×	177 0.8×	26	1.7k
Ivanov As Russia	22	944 1.0×	259 0.6×	172 0.4×	168 0.5×	94 0.4×	183	1.8k
Giulio Poli Italy	27	1.2k 1.3×	478 1.2×	518 1.3×	424 1.2×	51 0.2×	98	2.0k
Adel Hamza United States	23	1.2k 1.3×	357 0.9×	292 0.7×	316 0.9×	108 0.5×	60	2.1k
Xiang‐Yang Ye China	25	1.1k 1.2×	129 0.3×	711 1.8×	342 0.9×	75 0.3×	79	2.4k
Ziru Dai China	21	823 0.9×	113 0.3×	167 0.4×	236 0.6×	67 0.3×	45	1.7k
Brian Springthorpe United Kingdom	5	879 1.0×	589 1.4×	546 1.4×	179 0.5×	41 0.2×	8	1.8k
Robert A. Volkmann United States	23	1.1k 1.2×	330 0.8×	367 0.9×	168 0.5×	165 0.8×	45	1.7k
J. Love United States	14	1.0k 1.1×	726 1.8×	537 1.3×	963 2.6×	101 0.5×	16	2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Angelo D. Favia

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Angelo D. Favia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angelo D. Favia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angelo D. Favia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Angelo D. Favia

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angelo D. Favia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angelo D. Favia. The network helps show where Angelo D. Favia may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angelo D. Favia

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angelo D. Favia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angelo D. Favia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Angelo D. Favia. Angelo D. Favia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Panaccione, Remo, Alison Potts Bleakman, Stefan Schreiber, et al.. (2025). US and European Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives on Fatigue in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease: Results From the Communicating Needs and Features of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Experiences Survey. Crohn s & Colitis 360. 7(2). otaf011–otaf011. 1 indexed citations

Dubinsky, Marla C., Alison Potts Bleakman, David T. Rubin, et al.. (2025). Impact of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease on sexual activity: United States and European patient perspectives from the communicating needs and features of IBD experiences (CONFIDE) survey. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 41(6). 1017–1030.

Rubin, David T., Alison Potts Bleakman, Simon Travis, et al.. (2025). Broad Impact of Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease: US, European, and Japanese Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives from the Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey. Advances in Therapy. 42(9). 4510–4526.

Schreiber, Stefan, Theresa Hunter, David T. Rubin, et al.. (2024). Patient and Health Care Professional Perceptions of the Experience and Impact of Symptoms of Moderate-to-Severe Crohn’s Disease in US and Europe: Results from the Cross-Sectional CONFIDE Study. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 69(7). 2333–2344. 8 indexed citations

Schreiber, Stefan, Theresa Hunter, Marla C. Dubinsky, et al.. (2023). S855 Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey: Burden and Impact of Bowel Urgency is Similar in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 118(10S). S633–S634. 1 indexed citations

Dubinsky, Marla C., Simon Travis, Remo Panaccione, et al.. (2023). S25 Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey: Impact of Moderate to Severe Crohn’s Disease Symptoms on Health Care Professional Treatment Decisions in the United States and Europe. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 118(12S). S7–S8. 1 indexed citations

Palermo, Giulia, Angelo D. Favia, Marino Convertino, & Marco De Vivo. (2015). The Molecular Basis for Dual Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH)/Cyclooxygenase (COX) Inhibition. ChemMedChem. 11(12). 1252–1258. 29 indexed citations

Prati, Federica, Angela De Simone, Paola Bisignano, et al.. (2014). Multitarget Drug Discovery for Alzheimer's Disease: Triazinones as BACE‐1 and GSK‐3β Inhibitors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 54(5). 1578–1582. 102 indexed citations

Bisignano, Paola, Chiara Lambruschini, Manuele Bicego, et al.. (2012). In Silico Deconstruction of ATP-Competitive Inhibitors of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3β. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 52(12). 3233–3244. 5 indexed citations

10.

Favia, Angelo D., Matteo Masetti, Maurizio Recanatini, & Andrea Cavalli. (2011). Substrate Binding Process and Mechanistic Functioning of Type 1 11β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase from Enhanced Sampling Methods. PLoS ONE. 6(9). e25375–e25375. 21 indexed citations

11.

Bicego, Manuele, Angelo D. Favia, Paola Bisignano, Andrea Cavalli, & Vittorio Murino. (2011). AN INNOVATIVE PROTOCOL FOR COMPARING PROTEIN BINDING SITES VIA ATOMIC GRID MAPS. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 413–422. 1 indexed citations

12.

Bottegoni, Giovanni, Angelo D. Favia, Maurizio Recanatini, & Andrea Cavalli. (2011). The role of fragment-based and computational methods in polypharmacology. Drug Discovery Today. 17(1-2). 23–34. 84 indexed citations

13.

Nobeli, Irene, Angelo D. Favia, & Janet M. Thornton. (2009). Protein promiscuity and its implications for biotechnology. Nature Biotechnology. 27(2). 157–167. 402 indexed citations

14.

Kahraman, Abdullah, Richard J. Morris, Roman A. Laskowski, Angelo D. Favia, & Janet M. Thornton. (2009). On the diversity of physicochemical environments experienced by identical ligands in binding pockets of unrelated proteins. Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics. 78(5). 1120–1136. 51 indexed citations

15.

Blum, Andreas, Angelo D. Favia, & Edmund Maser. (2008). 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitors with oleanan and ursan scaffolds. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 301(1-2). 132–136. 20 indexed citations

16.

Persson, Bengt, Yvonne Kallberg, James E. Bray, et al.. (2008). The SDR (short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase and related enzymes) nomenclature initiative. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 178(1-3). 94–98. 323 indexed citations

17.

Favia, Angelo D., Ewa S. Pilka, Michael Kisiela, et al.. (2008). Analysis of the substrate-binding site of human carbonyl reductases CBR1 and CBR3 by site-directed mutagenesis. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 178(1-3). 234–241. 29 indexed citations

18.

Favia, Angelo D., Irene Nobeli, Fabian Glaser, & Janet M. Thornton. (2007). Molecular Docking for Substrate Identification: The Short-Chain Dehydrogenases/Reductases. Journal of Molecular Biology. 375(3). 855–874. 53 indexed citations

19.

Favia, Angelo D., Andrea Cavalli, Matteo Masetti, Angelo Carotti, & Maurizio Recanatini. (2006). Three‐dimensional model of the human aromatase enzyme and density functional parameterization of the iron‐containing protoporphyrin IX for a molecular dynamics study of heme‐cysteinato cytochromes. Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics. 62(4). 1074–1087. 81 indexed citations

20.

Catto, Marco, Orazio Nicolotti, Francesco Leonetti, et al.. (2006). Structural Insights into Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitory Potency and Selectivity of 7-Substituted Coumarins from Ligand- and Target-Based Approaches. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 49(16). 4912–4925. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact