J.A.M. Berghout

823 total citations
8 papers, 618 citations indexed

About

J.A.M. Berghout is a scholar working on Food Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, J.A.M. Berghout has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 618 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Food Science, 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 2 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in J.A.M. Berghout's work include Botanical Research and Chemistry (6 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (5 papers) and Food composition and properties (2 papers). J.A.M. Berghout is often cited by papers focused on Botanical Research and Chemistry (6 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (5 papers) and Food composition and properties (2 papers). J.A.M. Berghout collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and Slovakia. J.A.M. Berghout's co-authors include Atze Jan van der Goot, Remko M. Boom, Pascalle J.M. Pelgrom, Maarten A.I. Schutyser, Constantinos V. Nikiforidis, Lena Jankowiak, Marlies E.J. Geerts, Jaap Keijer, Paul Venema and Claire Berton‐Carabin and has published in prestigious journals such as Food Chemistry, Chemical Engineering Science and Food Hydrocolloids.

In The Last Decade

J.A.M. Berghout

8 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J.A.M. Berghout Netherlands	8	458	185	108	95	95	8	618
Kai Kai China	10	313 0.7×	133 0.7×	68 0.6×	38 0.4×	247 2.6×	17	574
Pascalle J.M. Pelgrom Netherlands	10	936 2.0×	588 3.2×	115 1.1×	47 0.5×	339 3.6×	10	1.2k
Alison Pletch United States	4	826 1.8×	492 2.7×	149 1.4×	56 0.6×	417 4.4×	6	1.1k
Stephanie Jeske Ireland	8	638 1.4×	354 1.9×	84 0.8×	27 0.3×	157 1.7×	10	818
Marlies E.J. Geerts Netherlands	6	337 0.7×	158 0.9×	73 0.7×	12 0.1×	60 0.6×	7	443
So-Hee Kim South Korea	12	158 0.3×	95 0.5×	78 0.7×	29 0.3×	176 1.9×	60	503
Md. Mostafa Kamal Bangladesh	14	289 0.6×	109 0.6×	118 1.1×	20 0.2×	171 1.8×	72	714
Yue He China	8	329 0.7×	169 0.9×	45 0.4×	17 0.2×	78 0.8×	16	427
Cecilia Ahlström Sweden	9	397 0.9×	214 1.2×	246 2.3×	10 0.1×	85 0.9×	15	557
Evdoxia M Papalamprou Greece	10	522 1.1×	248 1.3×	56 0.5×	60 0.6×	162 1.7×	10	631

Countries citing papers authored by J.A.M. Berghout

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.A.M. Berghout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.A.M. Berghout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.A.M. Berghout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.A.M. Berghout

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.A.M. Berghout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.A.M. Berghout. The network helps show where J.A.M. Berghout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.A.M. Berghout

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.A.M. Berghout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.A.M. Berghout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.A.M. Berghout. J.A.M. Berghout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Goot, Atze Jan van der, Pascalle J.M. Pelgrom, J.A.M. Berghout, et al.. (2015). Concepts for further sustainable production of foods. Journal of Food Engineering. 168. 42–51. 198 indexed citations

2.

Berghout, J.A.M., Paul Venema, Remko M. Boom, & Atze Jan van der Goot. (2015). Comparing functional properties of concentrated protein isolates with freeze-dried protein isolates from lupin seeds. Food Hydrocolloids. 51. 346–354. 46 indexed citations

3.

Berghout, J.A.M., et al.. (2015). Aqueous fractionation yields chemically stable lupin protein isolates. Food Research International. 72. 82–90. 14 indexed citations

4.

Berghout, J.A.M., Remko M. Boom, & Atze Jan van der Goot. (2014). The potential of aqueous fractionation of lupin seeds for high-protein foods. Food Chemistry. 159. 64–70. 67 indexed citations

5.

Berghout, J.A.M., Remko M. Boom, & Atze Jan van der Goot. (2014). Understanding the differences in gelling properties between lupin protein isolate and soy protein isolate. Food Hydrocolloids. 43. 465–472. 112 indexed citations

6.

Berghout, J.A.M., Pascalle J.M. Pelgrom, Maarten A.I. Schutyser, Remko M. Boom, & Atze Jan van der Goot. (2014). Sustainability assessment of oilseed fractionation processes: A case study on lupin seeds. Journal of Food Engineering. 150. 117–124. 73 indexed citations

7.

Pelgrom, Pascalle J.M., et al.. (2014). Preparation of functional lupine protein fractions by dry separation. LWT. 59(2). 680–688. 96 indexed citations

8.

Berghout, J.A.M., et al.. (2012). Starch–gluten separation by shearing: Influence of the device geometry. Chemical Engineering Science. 73. 421–430. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact