I‐Chien Chen

796 citations
29 papers · 485 indexed · h-index 13

I‐Chien Chen

27 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

I‐Chien Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Education 197
  • Clinical Psychology 101
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 52
  • Applied Psychology 20
  • Computer Science Applications 20
Replace Maureen A. McCarthy with:
Maureen A. McCarthy United States
Glenn A. Williams United Kingdom
Katriona O’Sullivan Ireland
Maria Weurlander Sweden
Bobbi Shatto United States
Nyaradzo Mvududu United States
Juhu Kim United States
Colleen Cordes United States
Nuri Doğan Türkiye
Ali Asghar Hayat Iran
I‐Chien Chen relative to Maureen A. McCarthy United States Maureen A. McCarthy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Maureen A. McCarthy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I‐Chien Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I‐Chien Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I‐Chien Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I‐Chien Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I‐Chien Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I‐Chien Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I‐Chien Chen. The network helps show where I‐Chien Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I‐Chien Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I‐Chien Chen Line = papers co-authored together I‐Chien Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20242
3 20238
4 202229
5 20227
6 202242
7 20223
8 202110
9 202020
10 20202
11 202022
12 201925
13 20185
14 201850
15 201633
16 2016104
17 20157
18 20143
19
Our Experience on the Influence of Task-Technology Fit Model on the Performance of Nursing Information System in Armed Forces General Hospital in Taiwan, Republic of China
20141
20 201219

About I‐Chien Chen

I‐Chien Chen is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems and Management and Health Information Management, having authored 29 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (4 papers), School Choice and Performance (4 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (3 papers), Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (2 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (197 citations), Clinical Psychology (101 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (52 citations). I‐Chien Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gregory M. Fosco, Mark J. Van Ryzin, Cary J. Roseth, You‐kyung Lee, Kenneth A. Frank, Tse‐Chuan Yang, Barbara Schneider, S. Choi, Joseph Krajcik and Anne Garrison Wilhelm. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research in Science Teaching, American Educational Research Journal, Social Science Research, American Journal of Education and Clinical Psychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026