Ibrar Bhatt

31 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

Ibrar Bhatt
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Linguistics and Language 40
  • Communication 58
  • Computer Science Applications 44
  • Literature and Literary Theory 88
  • Information Systems 152
Replace Tina Matuchniak with:
Tina Matuchniak United States
Ahmad S. Haider Jordan
Bee Hoon Tan Malaysia
Jinyan Huang China
Scott Bulfin Australia
Tzu‐Bin Lin Taiwan
Ezekiel Dixon‐Román United States
María Martínez Lirola Spain
Ann Hewings United Kingdom
Ronald D. Kieffer United States
Ibrar Bhatt relative to Tina Matuchniak United States Tina Matuchniak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Tina Matuchniak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ibrar Bhatt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ibrar Bhatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ibrar Bhatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ibrar Bhatt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ibrar Bhatt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ibrar Bhatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ibrar Bhatt. The network helps show where Ibrar Bhatt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ibrar Bhatt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ibrar Bhatt Line = papers co-authored together Ibrar Bhatt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201979
2 201850
3 201443
4 201230
5 201525
6 201924
7 201921
8 201921
9 202319
10 202319
11 202419
12 202116
13 201915
14 202010
15 20229
16 20248
17 20178
18 20256
19 20225
20 20215

About Ibrar Bhatt

Ibrar Bhatt is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Education, Literature and Literary Theory and Communication, having authored 33 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Education and Society (8 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (6 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (4 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (4 papers) and Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (40 citations), Communication (58 citations), Computer Science Applications (44 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (88 citations) and Information Systems (152 citations). Ibrar Bhatt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Alison MacKenzie, Kathy Luckett, Jennifer Rose, Dávid Barton, Mary Hamilton, Karin Tusting, Heng Wang, Chonglong Gu, Zhen Li and Mbulungeni Madiba. Their work appears in journals such as Postdigital Science and Education, Teaching in Higher Education, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development and Open Linguistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact