Hye Won Yeom
About
In The Last Decade
Hye Won Yeom
8 papers receiving 473 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Biotechnology 343
- Food Science 243
- Plant Science 114
- Physiology 100
- Biochemistry 76
Countries citing papers authored by Hye Won Yeom
This map shows the geographic impact of Hye Won Yeom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hye Won Yeom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hye Won Yeom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hye Won Yeom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hye Won Yeom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hye Won Yeom. The network helps show where Hye Won Yeom may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hye Won Yeom
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hye Won Yeom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hye Won Yeom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hye Won Yeom. Hye Won Yeom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 123 | |
| 6 | Effects of pulsed electric fields on the quality of foods / | 1 |
| 7 | 273 | |
| 8 | 83 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.