Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Food Science top 0.2%
- Biochemistry top 0.1%
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Co-authors
- Cristina TheodulozJaime Rodrı́guezMario J. SimirgiotisFelipe Jiménez‐AspeeLuís AstudilloGabriela E. FeresinAlejandro TapiaMariano Pertino
- Topics
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (67 papers)Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (65 papers)Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (46 papers)
- Cited by
- BiochemistryFood SciencePharmacology
In The Last Decade
Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann
267 papers receiving 7.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- Plant Science 2.8k
- Molecular Biology 2.7k
- Food Science 2.2k
- Biochemistry 1.9k
- Organic Chemistry 808
Countries citing papers authored by Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann. The network helps show where Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann. Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 50 | |
| 10 | 112 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 107 | |
| 16 | 81 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | Flavonoids from Calycorectes, Campomanesia, Eugenia and Hexachlamys species | 51 |
| 20 | 12 |
About Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann
Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Toxicology and Food Science, having authored 272 papers that have together received 7.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (67 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (65 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (46 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (1.9k citations), Food Science (2.2k citations) and Pharmacology (789 citations). Guillermo Schmeda‐Hirschmann has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Argentina and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Cristina Theoduloz, Jaime Rodrı́guez, Mario J. Simirgiotis, Felipe Jiménez‐Aspee, Luís Astudillo, Gabriela E. Feresin, Alejandro Tapia, Mariano Pertino, Antonieta Rojas de Árias and Cristina Quispe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Scientific Reports and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.