Gloria L. Ge
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Accounting top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Daniel Z. DingSyed AkhtarMalcolm WarnerBill MerrileesPeter SmithDale MillerStephanie Christine SchleimerChristina Stringer
- Topics
- International Business and FDI (8 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers)Global trade and economics (4 papers)
- Journals
- The International Journal of Human Resource ManagementJournal of Services MarketingHuman Resource Management
- Partner nations
- AustraliaHong KongNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Gloria L. Ge
15 papers receiving 448 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Strategy and Management 229
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 199
- Accounting 105
- Sociology and Political Science 81
- Management of Technology and Innovation 52
Countries citing papers authored by Gloria L. Ge
This map shows the geographic impact of Gloria L. Ge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gloria L. Ge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gloria L. Ge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gloria L. Ge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gloria L. Ge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gloria L. Ge. The network helps show where Gloria L. Ge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gloria L. Ge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gloria L. Ge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gloria L. Ge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gloria L. Ge. Gloria L. Ge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 156 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 5 |
About Gloria L. Ge
Gloria L. Ge is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Strategy and Management and Public Administration, having authored 16 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Business and FDI (8 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers) and Global trade and economics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (199 citations), Strategy and Management (229 citations) and Accounting (105 citations). Gloria L. Ge has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Hong Kong and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Z. Ding, Syed Akhtar, Malcolm Warner, Bill Merrilees, Peter Smith, Dale Miller, Stephanie Christine Schleimer and Christina Stringer. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Journal of Services Marketing and Human Resource Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.