Edward J. Carberry

881 total citations
17 papers, 607 citations indexed

About

Edward J. Carberry is a scholar working on Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Edward J. Carberry has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 607 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Accounting, 8 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 5 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Edward J. Carberry's work include Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers) and Family Business Performance and Succession (3 papers). Edward J. Carberry is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers) and Family Business Performance and Succession (3 papers). Edward J. Carberry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Edward J. Carberry's co-authors include Jordan Otten, Marc van Essen, Brayden G King, Michael Lounsbury, Abhijit Chaudhury, Pratyush Bharati, David Levy, Edward J. Zajac, Joo Hun Han and Douglas Kruse and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Management, Journal of Management Studies and Organization Studies.

In The Last Decade

Edward J. Carberry

17 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Edward J. Carberry United States 9 292 239 177 101 69 17 607
Sun Hyun Park United States 9 228 0.8× 237 1.0× 182 1.0× 104 1.0× 50 0.7× 18 559
Jason W. Ridge United States 12 210 0.7× 290 1.2× 163 0.9× 89 0.9× 46 0.7× 14 610
Jeremy J. Marcel United States 8 434 1.5× 344 1.4× 248 1.4× 95 0.9× 38 0.6× 11 744
Abhijith G. Acharya United States 5 310 1.1× 336 1.4× 170 1.0× 255 2.5× 48 0.7× 6 692
Yuval Deutsch Canada 10 518 1.8× 344 1.4× 226 1.3× 66 0.7× 90 1.3× 17 796
François Neville Canada 9 212 0.7× 202 0.8× 148 0.8× 157 1.6× 62 0.9× 16 534
Rebecca A. Luce United States 6 281 1.0× 440 1.8× 189 1.1× 54 0.5× 131 1.9× 8 689
Joseph Harrison United States 11 392 1.3× 253 1.1× 211 1.2× 71 0.7× 54 0.8× 19 752
Terrence C. Sebora United States 11 297 1.0× 193 0.8× 274 1.5× 80 0.8× 37 0.5× 19 649
David H. Zhu United States 13 440 1.5× 243 1.0× 214 1.2× 90 0.9× 39 0.6× 31 735

Countries citing papers authored by Edward J. Carberry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward J. Carberry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward J. Carberry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward J. Carberry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward J. Carberry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward J. Carberry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward J. Carberry. The network helps show where Edward J. Carberry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward J. Carberry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward J. Carberry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward J. Carberry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward J. Carberry. Edward J. Carberry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Carberry, Edward J., et al.. (2024). Feeling like owners: the impact of high-performance work practices and psychological ownership on employee outcomes in employee-owned companies. International Review of Applied Economics. 39(4-5). 595–616. 1 indexed citations
2.
King, Brayden G & Edward J. Carberry. (2020). Movements, Societal Crisis, and Organizational Theory. Journal of Management Studies. 57(8). 1741–1745. 15 indexed citations
3.
Carberry, Edward J., et al.. (2020). Understanding Employee Activism in the High-Tech Sector: A Comparative Case Analysis. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2020(1). 20523–20523. 1 indexed citations
4.
Carberry, Edward J. & Edward J. Zajac. (2020). Unpacking the dynamics of a contested practice: the case of executive compensation and the shareholder value orientation in the USA. Socio-Economic Review. 19(1). 157–187. 9 indexed citations
5.
Carberry, Edward J., Pratyush Bharati, David Levy, & Abhijit Chaudhury. (2017). Social Movements as Catalysts for Corporate Social Innovation: Environmental Activism and Adoption of Green Information Systems. 1 indexed citations
6.
King, Brayden G & Edward J. Carberry. (2017). Reversed Riches and Matthew’s Curse: The Liability of Status When Organizations Misbehave. Journal of Management Inquiry. 27(4). 365–367. 9 indexed citations
7.
Carberry, Edward J. & Edward J. Zajac. (2017). How U.S. Corporations Changed Executive Compensation after Enron: Substance and Symbol. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2017(1). 15134–15134. 1 indexed citations
8.
Carberry, Edward J., et al.. (2017). Are the “best” better for everyone? Demographic variation in employee perceptions of Fortune’s “Best Companies to Work For”. Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal. 36(7). 647–669. 8 indexed citations
9.
Carberry, Edward J., Pratyush Bharati, David Levy, & Abhijit Chaudhury. (2017). Social Movements as Catalysts for Corporate Social Innovation: Environmental Activism and the Adoption of Green Information Systems. Business & Society. 58(5). 1083–1127. 90 indexed citations
10.
Carberry, Edward J., et al.. (2014). Understanding employee preferences for investing in employer stock: evidence from France. Human Resource Management Journal. 24(4). 548–566. 14 indexed citations
11.
Carberry, Edward J., et al.. (2012). Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 51 indexed citations
12.
Essen, Marc van, Jordan Otten, & Edward J. Carberry. (2012). Assessing Managerial Power Theory. Journal of Management. 41(1). 164–202. 263 indexed citations
13.
Otten, Jordan, Edward J. Carberry, Marc van Essen, & Hans van Oosterhout. (2012). Towards an institutional theory of managerial power on CEO compensation: an international test. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2012(1). 15814–15814. 1 indexed citations
14.
Carberry, Edward J. & Brayden G King. (2012). Defensive Practice Adoption in the Face of Organizational Stigma: Impression Management and the Diffusion of Stock Option Expensing. Journal of Management Studies. 49(7). 1137–1167. 82 indexed citations
15.
Carberry, Edward J.. (2012). Making sense of organizational environments: the adoption of employee stock options in the Indian technology sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 23(8). 1519–1546. 4 indexed citations
16.
Carberry, Edward J.. (2009). EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS AFTER ENRON: THEORIZING MANAGERIAL POWER WITHIN INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENTS.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2009(1). 1–6. 1 indexed citations
17.
Lounsbury, Michael & Edward J. Carberry. (2005). From King to Court Jester? Weber’s Fall from Grace in Organizational Theory. Organization Studies. 26(4). 501–525. 56 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026