G.J. van Helden

1.8k total citations
47 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

G.J. van Helden is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, G.J. van Helden has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Management Information Systems, 23 papers in Public Administration and 10 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in G.J. van Helden's work include Accounting and Organizational Management (25 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (23 papers) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (8 papers). G.J. van Helden is often cited by papers focused on Accounting and Organizational Management (25 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (23 papers) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (8 papers). G.J. van Helden collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Finland and United States. G.J. van Helden's co-authors include Henk J. ter Bogt, Christoph Reichard, Sandra Tillema, Giuseppe Grossi, Åge Johnsen, Jarmo Vakkuri, Deryl Northcott, Erik Jansen, Berend van der Kolk and Hans de Bruijn and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Economics Letters and Management Accounting Research.

In The Last Decade

G.J. van Helden

41 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G.J. van Helden Netherlands 18 743 710 306 261 246 47 1.2k
Åge Johnsen Norway 24 667 0.9× 836 1.2× 241 0.8× 317 1.2× 355 1.4× 51 1.4k
Stan Brignall United Kingdom 11 746 1.0× 356 0.5× 210 0.7× 100 0.4× 290 1.2× 14 1.1k
Jarmo Vakkuri Finland 21 395 0.5× 454 0.6× 152 0.5× 162 0.6× 214 0.9× 51 942
Christoph Reichard Germany 17 282 0.4× 480 0.7× 220 0.7× 358 1.4× 242 1.0× 72 1.1k
Peter Skærbæk Denmark 16 626 0.8× 387 0.5× 354 1.2× 94 0.4× 236 1.0× 31 1.0k
Louise Kloot Australia 12 435 0.6× 280 0.4× 182 0.6× 119 0.5× 317 1.3× 24 981
Mathew Tsamenyi United Kingdom 16 738 1.0× 211 0.3× 709 2.3× 95 0.4× 351 1.4× 40 1.4k
Ciarán Connolly United Kingdom 19 339 0.5× 469 0.7× 308 1.0× 125 0.5× 364 1.5× 53 1.3k
Arie Halachmi United States 19 335 0.5× 420 0.6× 47 0.2× 235 0.9× 250 1.0× 76 981
Gerhard Hammerschmid Germany 16 231 0.3× 580 0.8× 56 0.2× 360 1.4× 267 1.1× 53 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by G.J. van Helden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.J. van Helden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.J. van Helden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.J. van Helden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.J. van Helden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.J. van Helden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.J. van Helden. The network helps show where G.J. van Helden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.J. van Helden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.J. van Helden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.J. van Helden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.J. van Helden. G.J. van Helden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bogt, Henk J. ter, G.J. van Helden, & Berend van der Kolk. (2015). Challenging the NPM Ideas About Performance Management: Selectivity and Differentiation in Outcome‐Oriented Performance Budgeting. Financial Accountability and Management. 31(3). 287–315. 56 indexed citations
2.
Bogt, Henk J. ter & G.J. van Helden. (2014). A pragmatic view on engaged scholarship in accounting research. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. 11(1). 40–50. 6 indexed citations
3.
Helden, G.J. van, et al.. (2014). Controlling overhead in public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 27(6). 475–485. 19 indexed citations
4.
Helden, G.J. van & Christoph Reichard. (2013). A meta-review of public sector performance management research. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 11(1). 10–20. 26 indexed citations
5.
Bogt, Henk J. ter, et al.. (2008). Role Variations of Performance Measurement in Dutch Local Government. 15(1). 4 indexed citations
6.
Helden, G.J. van. (2005). Foreword: Modernisation in the Public Sector. Financial Accountability and Management. 21(1). 9–11. 5 indexed citations
7.
Helden, G.J. van, et al.. (2005). Werkt benchmarking bij waterschappen?. Bestuurskunde. 14(2). 30–39. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bogt, Henk J. ter & G.J. van Helden. (2005). A Reflection on Accounting Reforms in Dutch Government. 247–282. 15 indexed citations
9.
Tillema, Sandra & G.J. van Helden. (2005). Appreciation, acceptance and use of multidimensional benchmarking information by public sector organizations. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 230–247. 3 indexed citations
10.
Helden, G.J. van, et al.. (2005). Benchmarking en prestatieverbetering in de publieke sector. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 79(11). 573–581. 1 indexed citations
11.
Helden, G.J. van, et al.. (2003). Benchmarking in the Dutch Waste-Water Treatment Sector. Public Money & Management. 23(2). 113–118. 2 indexed citations
12.
Helden, G.J. van & Erik Jansen. (2003). New Public Management in Dutch Local Government. Local Government Studies. 29(2). 68–88. 44 indexed citations
13.
Helden, G.J. van, J. van der Meer-Kooistra, & Robert W. Scapens. (2001). Co-ordination of internal transactions at Hoogovens steel: struggling with the tension between performance-oriented business units and the concept of an integrated company. Management Accounting Research. 12(3). 357–386. 26 indexed citations
14.
Bogt, Henk J. ter & G.J. van Helden. (2000). Accounting Change in Dutch Government: Exploring the Gap between Expectations and Realisations. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations
15.
Helden, G.J. van, et al.. (1999). Perspectieven voor manage ment accountingonderzoek. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 73(12). 630–637.
16.
Helden, G.J. van, et al.. (1996). De Balanced Scorecard in non-profit organisaties. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 1196. 406–413.
17.
Helden, G.J. van & Vu. (1994). De bedrijfsmatige non-profitorganisatie: perspectieven en belemmeringen. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
18.
Helden, G.J. van, Peter S. H. Leeflang, & Elmer Sterken. (1987). Estimation of the demand for electricity. Applied Economics. 19(1). 69–82. 10 indexed citations
19.
Helden, G.J. van & Joan Muysken. (1983). Diseconomies of scale for plant utilisation in electricity generation. Economics Letters. 11(3). 285–289. 4 indexed citations
20.
Helden, G.J. van & Joan Muysken. (1981). Economies of scale and technological change in electricity generation in The Netherlands. De Economist. 129(4). 476–503. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026