George M. A. Stanic

22 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

George M. A. Stanic
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Education 301
  • Statistics and Probability 78
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
  • Sociology and Political Science 51
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 32
Replace Beatriz S. D’Ambrosio with:
Beatriz S. D’Ambrosio United States
Marilyn E. Strutchens United States
Eva Jablonka Sweden
Falk Seeger Germany
Cheryl A. Lubinski United States
Eula Ewing Monroe United States
Heinrich Bauersfeld Germany
Christopher Ormell United Kingdom
Karen Skilling Australia
Carol Corbett Burris United States
George M. A. Stanic relative to Beatriz S. D’Ambrosio United States Beatriz S. D’Ambrosio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Beatriz S. D’Ambrosio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George M. A. Stanic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George M. A. Stanic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George M. A. Stanic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George M. A. Stanic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George M. A. Stanic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George M. A. Stanic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George M. A. Stanic. The network helps show where George M. A. Stanic may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George M. A. Stanic

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George M. A. Stanic. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George M. A. Stanic based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George M. A. Stanic. George M. A. Stanic is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
A history of school mathematics
62
2 1
3 3
4 11
5 18
6 1
7 2
8
Parental Involvement in a Time of Changing Demographics.
2
9 4
10 21
11 59
12 3
13 110
14
Minorities and Mathematics.
1
15
Gender and Race Differences in Mathematics: A Case Study of a Seventh-Grade Classroom.
3
16 22
17 1
18
A Review of the Literature on Blacks and Mathematics.
7
19 1
20
Why teach mathematics? : a historical study of the justification question
4

About George M. A. Stanic

George M. A. Stanic is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Education and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 22 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (9 papers), Historical Education Studies Worldwide (3 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (14 citations), Education (301 citations) and Statistics and Probability (78 citations). George M. A. Stanic has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Laurie Hart Reyes, Jeremy Kilpatrick, Anthony D. Pellegrini, Frank Lester, Harold A. Taylor, J. A. Easley, Douglas T. Owens and Twentieth Century Fund. Their work appears in journals such as Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education and Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026