Fred Hafferty
Impact in
- Family Practice top 2%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
-
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Medical Education and Admissions
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 2
-
- Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare 2
- Co-authors
- Samantha Johnson (1 shared paper)Ed Peile (1 shared paper)Neil Johnson (1 shared paper)Vimmi Passi (1 shared paper)Scott M. Wright (1 shared paper)Ming‐Jung Ho (1 shared paper)Richard L. Cruess (1 shared paper)Walther van Mook (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Medical Teacher (2 papers)Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law (1 paper)Academic Medicine (1 paper)Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (1 paper)Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Fred Hafferty
7 papers receiving 504 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Family Practice 121
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 430
- Research and Theory 13
- General Health Professions 242
- Psychiatry and Mental health 141
Countries citing papers authored by Fred Hafferty
This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Hafferty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Hafferty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Hafferty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Hafferty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Hafferty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Hafferty. The network helps show where Fred Hafferty may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred Hafferty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 239 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 222 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 0 |
About Fred Hafferty
Fred Hafferty is a scholar working on Family Practice, Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper) and Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (121 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (430 citations), Research and Theory (13 citations), General Health Professions (242 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (141 citations). Fred Hafferty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Samantha Johnson, Ed Peile, Neil Johnson, Vimmi Passi, Scott M. Wright, Ming‐Jung Ho, Richard L. Cruess, Walther van Mook, Charlotte E. Rees and Sylvia R. Cruess. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, Academic Medicine, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.