Ed Peile

2.3k total citations
45 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Ed Peile is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Ed Peile has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10 papers in Family Practice and 9 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Ed Peile's work include Innovations in Medical Education (20 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (10 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers). Ed Peile is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (20 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (10 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers). Ed Peile collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Ed Peile's co-authors include Neil Johnson, Vimmi Passi, Jill Thistlethwaite, Scott M. Wright, Fred Hafferty, Samantha Johnson, Maggie Allen, Zoé Paskins, Gill Morrow and Jan Illing and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

In The Last Decade

Ed Peile

40 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ed Peile United Kingdom	17	839	479	223	181	132	45	1.4k
John B. Schorling United States	33	514 0.6×	858 1.8×	96 0.4×	252 1.4×	44 0.3×	74	3.3k
Sarah Ross United Kingdom	19	639 0.8×	370 0.8×	383 1.7×	103 0.6×	99 0.8×	46	1.7k
Nicola Brennan United Kingdom	16	503 0.6×	496 1.0×	111 0.5×	84 0.5×	66 0.5×	30	1.1k
Carole Parsons United Kingdom	27	437 0.5×	436 0.9×	240 1.1×	254 1.4×	51 0.4×	69	1.9k
Jack D. McCue United States	21	805 1.0×	810 1.7×	60 0.3×	142 0.8×	16 0.1×	58	1.9k
Arthur H. Fierman United States	25	473 0.6×	625 1.3×	38 0.2×	239 1.3×	440 3.3×	58	2.2k
Walter Tavares Canada	24	799 1.0×	573 1.2×	387 1.7×	45 0.2×	115 0.9×	118	2.1k
William J. Hueston United States	28	511 0.6×	606 1.3×	28 0.1×	68 0.4×	21 0.2×	118	2.6k
J. G. R. Howie United Kingdom	26	404 0.5×	1.6k 3.2×	91 0.4×	256 1.4×	23 0.2×	74	2.6k
Tai Pong Lam Hong Kong	21	207 0.2×	581 1.2×	19 0.1×	166 0.9×	62 0.5×	94	1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Ed Peile

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ed Peile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ed Peile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ed Peile more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ed Peile

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ed Peile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ed Peile. The network helps show where Ed Peile may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ed Peile

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ed Peile. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ed Peile based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ed Peile. Ed Peile is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Dhingra, Sameer, Nor Azlina A. Rahman, Ed Peile, et al.. (2020). Microbial Resistance Movements: An Overview of Global Public Health Threats Posed by Antimicrobial Resistance, and How Best to Counter. Frontiers in Public Health. 8. 535668–535668. 212 indexed citations

Yardley, Sarah, et al.. (2018). The do’s, don’t and don’t knows of supporting transition to more independent practice. Perspectives on Medical Education. 7(1). 8–22. 59 indexed citations

Sorinola, Olanrewaju, Jill Thistlethwaite, David Davies, & Ed Peile. (2014). Faculty development for educators: a realist evaluation. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 20(2). 385–401. 22 indexed citations

Illing, Jan, Gill Morrow, Charlotte Kergon, et al.. (2013). Perceptions of UK medical graduates’ preparedness for practice: A multi-centre qualitative study reflecting the importance of learning on the job. BMC Medical Education. 13(1). 34–34. 135 indexed citations

Gill, Peter J., Paul Hewitson, Ed Peile, & Anthony Harnden. (2012). Prioritizing areas for quality marker development in children in UK general practice: extending the use of the nominal group technique. Family Practice. 29(5). 567–575. 12 indexed citations

Shehmar, Manjeet, et al.. (2012). Predicting success in graduate entry medical students undertaking a graduate entry medical program. Medical Teacher. 34(8). 659–664. 10 indexed citations

Morrow, Gill, Neil Johnson, Bryan Burford, et al.. (2012). Preparedness for practice: The perceptions of medical graduates and clinical teams. Medical Teacher. 34(2). 123–135. 78 indexed citations

Wolfe, Ingrid, Hilary Cass, Matthew Thompson, et al.. (2011). Improving child health services in the UK: insights from Europe and their implications for the NHS reforms. BMJ. 342(mar08 1). d1277–d1277. 64 indexed citations

Rothwell, Charlotte, Bryan Burford, Jill Morrison, et al.. (2011). Junior doctors prescribing: enhancing their learning in practice. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 73(2). 194–202. 66 indexed citations

10.

Fulford, K. W. M., et al.. (2011). Values-Based Practice: Linking Science with People. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. 41(3). 145–156. 5 indexed citations

11.

Paskins, Zoé & Ed Peile. (2010). Final year medical students’ views on simulation-based teaching: A comparison with the Best Evidence Medical Education Systematic Review. Medical Teacher. 32(7). 569–577. 67 indexed citations

12.

Paskins, Zoé, et al.. (2010). Design, validation and dissemination of an undergraduate assessment tool using SimMan® in simulated medical emergencies. Medical Teacher. 32(1). e12–e17. 12 indexed citations

13.

Shehmar, Manjeet, et al.. (2009). A validity study of the national UK colposcopy objective structured clinical examination—is it a test fit for purpose?. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 116(13). 1796–1800. 8 indexed citations

14.

Illing, Jan, Gill Morrow, Charlotte Kergon, et al.. (2008). How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice ? a comparison of three diverse UK medical schools. Final report to GMC April 2008.. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 59 indexed citations

15.

Carter, Yvonne H & Ed Peile. (2007). Graduate entry medicine: high aspirations at birth. Clinical Medicine. 7(2). 143–147. 23 indexed citations

16.

Carter, Yvonne H & Ed Peile. (2007). Graduate entry medicine: curriculum considerations. Clinical Medicine. 7(3). 253–256. 7 indexed citations

17.

Peile, Ed. (2004). how can experts and novices learn together?. BMJ. 329(7471). 902.1–902.1.

18.

Peile, Ed, Graham Easton, & Nicola F. Johnson. (2001). The year in a training practice: what has lasting value? Grounded theoretical categories and dimensions from a pilot study. Medical Teacher. 23(2). 205–211. 8 indexed citations

19.

Peile, Ed, et al.. (2001). The Renaissance School of General Medicine. BMJ. 323(7327). 1454–1455. 2 indexed citations

20.

Powell, Douglas W. & Ed Peile. (2000). Joint working. It's a stitch-up.. PubMed. 110(5702). 24–5. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact