Ed Peile

2.3k citations
45 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ed Peile

40 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ed Peile
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Family Practice 223
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 69
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 839
  • Research and Theory 22
  • General Health Professions 479
Replace John B. Schorling with:
John B. Schorling United States
Jack D. McCue United States
Nicola Brennan United Kingdom
Sarah Ross United Kingdom
Walter Tavares Canada
J. G. R. Howie United Kingdom
Carole Parsons United Kingdom
Jelle Tichelaar Netherlands
Barbara King United States
Jason E. Farley United States
Ed Peile relative to John B. Schorling United States John B. Schorling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
John B. Schorling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ed Peile

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ed Peile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ed Peile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ed Peile more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ed Peile

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ed Peile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ed Peile. The network helps show where Ed Peile may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ed Peile, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ed Peile Line = papers co-authored together Ed Peile links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013222
2 2020212
3 2013135
4 2010128
5 201278
6 201067
7 201166
8 201164
9
How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice ? a comparison of three diverse UK medical schools. Final report to GMC April 2008.
200859
10 201859
11 201351
12 201249
13 201242
14 198629
15 201727
16 200723
17 201422
18 201212
19 201012
20 201210

About Ed Peile

Ed Peile is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Gender Studies, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (20 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (10 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (6 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (223 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (69 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (839 citations), Research and Theory (22 citations) and General Health Professions (479 citations). Ed Peile has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Neil Johnson, Vimmi Passi, Jill Thistlethwaite, Samantha Johnson, Fred Hafferty, Scott M. Wright, Zoé Paskins, Maggie Allen, Jan Illing and Gill Morrow. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, Clinical Medicine, Journal of Interprofessional Care, Family Practice and BMJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact