Ming‐Jung Ho

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
50 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Ming‐Jung Ho is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ming‐Jung Ho has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 21 papers in General Health Professions and 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Ming‐Jung Ho's work include Innovations in Medical Education (34 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (10 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (9 papers). Ming‐Jung Ho is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (34 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (10 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (9 papers). Ming‐Jung Ho collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Ming‐Jung Ho's co-authors include Jessie Norris, Quentin Eichbaum, Lisa V. Adams, Susan van Schalkwyk, Jessica Evert, Innocent Semali, David A. Hirsh, Charlotte E. Rees, Shiphra Ginsburg and Yu‐Ting Chiu and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Academic Medicine and Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Ming‐Jung Ho

48 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Decolonizing Global Health Education: Rethinking Institut... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ming‐Jung Ho Taiwan 18 817 468 219 205 192 50 1.2k
Noëlle Junod Perron Switzerland 21 558 0.7× 653 1.4× 213 1.0× 145 0.7× 112 0.6× 68 1.3k
Sonia Crandall United States 21 872 1.1× 712 1.5× 263 1.2× 389 1.9× 271 1.4× 75 1.6k
Paul Crampton United Kingdom 15 455 0.6× 393 0.8× 133 0.6× 205 1.0× 118 0.6× 45 928
Dujeepa D. Samarasekera Singapore 18 726 0.9× 417 0.9× 103 0.5× 79 0.4× 168 0.9× 88 1.2k
M. Roy Schwarz United States 14 892 1.1× 499 1.1× 253 1.2× 120 0.6× 135 0.7× 36 1.3k
Charles Boelen Canada 19 837 1.0× 689 1.5× 538 2.5× 82 0.4× 87 0.5× 55 1.2k
Calvin L. Chou United States 24 998 1.2× 492 1.1× 96 0.4× 138 0.7× 237 1.2× 65 1.5k
Elizabeth Kachur United States 16 549 0.7× 315 0.7× 92 0.4× 133 0.6× 87 0.5× 41 998
Carol S. Hodgson United States 14 1.2k 1.4× 488 1.0× 85 0.4× 84 0.4× 147 0.8× 39 1.6k
Douglas M. Brock United States 17 413 0.5× 685 1.5× 247 1.1× 81 0.4× 48 0.3× 42 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Jung Ho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Jung Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Jung Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Jung Ho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Jung Ho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Jung Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Jung Ho. The network helps show where Ming‐Jung Ho may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ming‐Jung Ho

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ming‐Jung Ho. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ming‐Jung Ho based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ming‐Jung Ho. Ming‐Jung Ho is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Li, Honghe, David A. Hirsh, Edward Krupat, et al.. (2025). East Meets West: A Multisite Validity Study of the China Medical Professionalism Inventory. Perspectives on Medical Education. 14(1). 603–618.
2.
Brooks, Joanna Veazey, Bonny L. Dickinson, Kelly M. Quesnelle, et al.. (2023). Professional Identity Formation of Basic Science Medical Educators: A Qualitative Study of Identity Supports and Threats. Academic Medicine. 98(Supplement_3). S14–S23. 7 indexed citations
4.
Wyatt, Tasha R., Ming‐Jung Ho, & Arianne Teherani. (2022). Centering Criticality in Medical Education Research: A Synthesis of the 2022 RIME Papers. Academic Medicine. 97(11S). S11–S14. 3 indexed citations
5.
Rashid, Ahmed, et al.. (2021). Public availability of information from WFME-recognized accreditation agencies. Human Resources for Health. 19(1). 78–78. 4 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Xin & Ming‐Jung Ho. (2021). When patient-centred and family-centred approaches clash: Taiwanese health professions students' patient autonomy dilemmas. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 26(5). 1625–1640. 2 indexed citations
7.
Park, Hyunmi, Young‐Mee Lee, Ming‐Jung Ho, & Hee Chul Han. (2021). How the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic changed medical education and deans’ perspectives in Korean medical schools. Korean journal of medical education. 33(2). 65–74. 17 indexed citations
8.
Mahfoud, Ziyad, et al.. (2020). Faculty perceptions of student plagiarism and interventions to tackle it: a multiphase mixed-methods study in Qatar. BMC Medical Education. 20(1). 315–315. 8 indexed citations
9.
Shaw, Malissa Kay, Madawa Chandratilake, Ming‐Jung Ho, Charlotte E. Rees, & Lynn V. Monrouxe. (2019). Female victims and female perpetrators: medical students’ narratives of gender dynamics and professionalism dilemmas. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 25(2). 299–319. 16 indexed citations
10.
Ho, Ming‐Jung, et al.. (2015). A Pilot Study of the Long-term Impact of a Taiwan-China Medical Clerkship Exchange Program. 19(2). 79–87. 1 indexed citations
11.
Huang, Amy, Sean Tackett, & Ming‐Jung Ho. (2015). Learning Environment Assessment of Clinical Students at National Taiwan University. 19(2). 65–78. 1 indexed citations
12.
Ho, Ming‐Jung, et al.. (2015). A comparative study of professional and interprofessional values between health professional associations. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 29(6). 628–633. 14 indexed citations
13.
Ho, Ming‐Jung, Kun‐Hsing Yu, Hui Pan, et al.. (2014). A Tale of Two Cities. Academic Medicine. 89(6). 944–950. 25 indexed citations
14.
Rider, Elizabeth A., Suzanne Kurtz, Diana Slade, et al.. (2014). The International Charter for Human Values in Healthcare: An interprofessional global collaboration to enhance values and communication in healthcare. Patient Education and Counseling. 96(3). 273–280. 68 indexed citations
15.
Ho, Ming‐Jung, et al.. (2012). Can narrative medicine training improve OSCE performance?. Medical Education. 46(11). 1112–1113. 16 indexed citations
16.
Ho, Ming‐Jung, Chi‐Wei Lin, Yu‐Ting Chiu, Lorelei Lingard, & Shiphra Ginsburg. (2012). A cross‐cultural study of students’ approaches to professional dilemmas: sticks or ripples. Medical Education. 46(3). 245–256. 42 indexed citations
17.
Ho, Ming‐Jung, et al.. (2011). Online social networking versus medical professionalism. Medical Education. 45(5). 523–523. 13 indexed citations
18.
Hodges, Brian, Shiphra Ginsburg, Richard L. Cruess, et al.. (2011). Assessment of professionalism: Recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Medical Teacher. 33(5). 354–363. 239 indexed citations
19.
Ho, Ming‐Jung, Elizabeth Gaufberg, & William J. Huang. (2008). Problem‐based learning: hidden curricular messages and cultural competence. Medical Education. 42(11). 1122–1123. 5 indexed citations
20.
Ho, Ming‐Jung. (2004). Sociocultural aspects of tuberculosis: a literature review and a case study of immigrant tuberculosis. Social Science & Medicine. 59(4). 753–762. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026