Fiona Poland

5.7k total citations
170 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Fiona Poland is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Fiona Poland has authored 170 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 90 papers in General Health Professions, 55 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 29 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Fiona Poland's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (32 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (32 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (30 papers). Fiona Poland is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (32 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (32 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (30 papers). Fiona Poland collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Fiona Poland's co-authors include Georgina Charlesworth, Amanda Howe, Anne Killett, Martin Orrell, Linda Birt, Chris Fox, Peter Campion, Derek Pheby, Luís Nacul and Esme Moniz‐Cook and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Fiona Poland

161 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fiona Poland United Kingdom 34 1.8k 1.2k 425 424 401 170 3.6k
Claire Bamford United Kingdom 28 1.4k 0.8× 939 0.8× 863 2.0× 338 0.8× 396 1.0× 73 3.2k
Cheryl Cott Canada 32 1.5k 0.8× 848 0.7× 482 1.1× 228 0.5× 342 0.9× 101 3.5k
H.‐H. König Germany 28 1.3k 0.7× 826 0.7× 596 1.4× 418 1.0× 652 1.6× 96 4.1k
Michael Finch United States 34 1.4k 0.8× 605 0.5× 299 0.7× 416 1.0× 235 0.6× 107 3.8k
Stephen MacGillivray United Kingdom 33 1.2k 0.7× 860 0.7× 989 2.3× 272 0.6× 463 1.2× 68 4.6k
Maria Orlando Edelen United States 34 1.2k 0.7× 573 0.5× 484 1.1× 400 0.9× 1.2k 3.0× 193 4.2k
Mary Ann McColl Canada 42 1.2k 0.7× 1.7k 1.4× 792 1.9× 584 1.4× 1.1k 2.8× 155 5.9k
Gerd Ahlström Sweden 38 1.6k 0.9× 823 0.7× 1.2k 2.9× 553 1.3× 999 2.5× 214 5.0k
Susan L. Hughes United States 32 1.2k 0.7× 635 0.5× 565 1.3× 302 0.7× 281 0.7× 105 3.5k
Debbie Tolson United Kingdom 28 1.3k 0.7× 500 0.4× 468 1.1× 238 0.6× 289 0.7× 125 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Poland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Poland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Poland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Poland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Poland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Poland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Poland. The network helps show where Fiona Poland may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fiona Poland

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fiona Poland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fiona Poland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fiona Poland. Fiona Poland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Birt, Linda, et al.. (2023). What happens when pharmacist independent prescribers lead on medicine management in older people’s care homes: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 13(10). e068678–e068678. 2 indexed citations
3.
Ssali, Agnes, Fiona Poland, & Janet Seeley. (2020). Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study. International Health. 12(6). 541–542. 3 indexed citations
4.
Streater, Amy, Jen Yates, David Challis, et al.. (2020). Development of an Evidence-Based Best Practice Model for Teams Managing Crisis in Dementia: Protocol for a Qualitative Study. JMIR Research Protocols. 10(1). e14781–e14781. 4 indexed citations
5.
6.
Birt, Linda, et al.. (2019). “It's my own fault”: Accounts and consequences of falling when living with rheumatoid arthritis. Musculoskeletal Care. 17(4). 346–353. 2 indexed citations
7.
Mathie, Elspeth, Helena Wythe, Diane Munday, et al.. (2018). Reciprocal relationships and the importance of feedback in patient and public involvement: A mixed methods study. Health Expectations. 21(5). 899–908. 61 indexed citations
8.
Clarkson, Paul, Jane Hughes, Brenda Roe, et al.. (2017). Systematic review: Effective home support in dementia care, components and impacts – Stage 2, effectiveness of home support interventions. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 74(3). 507–527. 15 indexed citations
9.
Bond, Christine, Kathleen Lane, Fiona Poland, et al.. (2016). GP views on the potential role of pharmacist independent prescribers within care homes: care homes independent pharmacist prescribing study (CHIPPS): ‘there has to be something in it for me’.. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 14–14. 1 indexed citations
10.
Wilsher, Stephanie Howard, Lisa Irvine, Hong Fan, et al.. (2015). Systematic overview of economic evaluations of health-related rehabilitation. Disability and health journal. 9(1). 11–25. 54 indexed citations
11.
Ssali, Agnes, Fiona Poland, & Janet Seeley. (2015). Volunteer experiences and perceptions of the informed consent process: Lessons from two HIV clinical trials in Uganda. BMC Medical Ethics. 16(1). 86–86. 16 indexed citations
12.
Abdelhamid, Asmaa, Diane Bunn, Angela Dickinson, et al.. (2014). Effectiveness of interventions to improve, maintain or faciltate oral food and/or drink intake in people with dementia. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 2 indexed citations
13.
Fox, Chris, et al.. (2014). Understanding the dementia diagnosis gap in Norfolk and Suffolk: a survey of general practitioners.. PubMed. 22(2). 101–7. 10 indexed citations
14.
Poland, Fiona. (2014). Quality in ageing and older adults. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults. 15(2). 17112166. 3 indexed citations
15.
Poland, Fiona, et al.. (2012). Drug administration guides in dysphagia.. PubMed. 108(21). 15–7. 1 indexed citations
16.
Poland, Fiona, et al.. (2009). A qualitative study of the food‐related experiences of rural village shop customers. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 22(2). 108–115. 16 indexed citations
17.
Boswell, Gwyneth, et al.. (2009). A research basis for addressing youth offending on the Broadland 'Stairway out of Crime' programme. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 7(2). 53. 1 indexed citations
18.
Charlesworth, Georgina, Lee Shepstone, Ed Wilson, et al.. (2008). Does befriending by trained lay workers improve psychological well-being and quality of life for carers of people with dementia, and at what cost? A randomised controlled trial. Health Technology Assessment. 12(4). iii, v–ix, 1. 65 indexed citations
19.
Boswell, Gwyneth & Fiona Poland. (2003). Women's minds, women's bodies : interdisciplinary approaches to women's health. Palgrave Macmillan eBooks. 2 indexed citations
20.
Charlesworth, Georgina, et al.. (2002). Recruiting Carers and Befrienders - Experiences from the Befriending and Cost of Caring (BECCA) Study. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Claire Bamford Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cheryl Cott Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H.‐H. König Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Finch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen MacGillivray Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maria Orlando Edelen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary Ann McColl Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gerd Ahlström Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susan L. Hughes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Debbie Tolson
Rankless by CCL
2026