Jen Yates

719 total citations
31 papers, 430 citations indexed

About

Jen Yates is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jen Yates has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 430 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 11 papers in General Health Professions and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jen Yates's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (7 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers). Jen Yates is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (7 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers). Jen Yates collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Jen Yates's co-authors include Linda Clare, Bob Woods, Tom Dening, Rajvinder Samra, Fiona E. Matthews, Anthony Martyr, Shulin Chen, Amy Streater, Eduwin Pakpahan and Aleksandra Kudlicka and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Age and Ageing.

In The Last Decade

Jen Yates

28 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jen Yates United Kingdom 12 247 91 68 66 64 31 430
Xuexin Yu United States 12 109 0.4× 82 0.9× 63 0.9× 46 0.7× 47 0.7× 37 370
Erin R. Harrell United States 11 152 0.6× 84 0.9× 71 1.0× 57 0.9× 48 0.8× 31 430
Nathália Alves de Oliveira Brazil 11 84 0.3× 116 1.3× 32 0.5× 86 1.3× 20 0.3× 26 376
Pricila Cristina Correa Ribeiro Brazil 11 110 0.4× 120 1.3× 19 0.3× 32 0.5× 20 0.3× 32 329
Rosalia J. M. van Knippenberg Netherlands 10 284 1.1× 223 2.5× 34 0.5× 171 2.6× 117 1.8× 16 539
Andy Cochrane Ireland 11 65 0.3× 134 1.5× 67 1.0× 106 1.6× 92 1.4× 24 482
Rainer Gabriel Switzerland 13 69 0.3× 126 1.4× 24 0.4× 34 0.5× 36 0.6× 18 409
Henrique Salmazo da Silva Brazil 11 65 0.3× 133 1.5× 58 0.9× 16 0.2× 24 0.4× 64 325
Phillip T. Potter United States 10 134 0.5× 81 0.9× 37 0.5× 139 2.1× 103 1.6× 12 610
Nickolas H. Lambrou United States 8 130 0.5× 52 0.6× 25 0.4× 58 0.9× 12 0.2× 28 367

Countries citing papers authored by Jen Yates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jen Yates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jen Yates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jen Yates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jen Yates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jen Yates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jen Yates. The network helps show where Jen Yates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jen Yates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jen Yates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jen Yates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jen Yates. Jen Yates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Redley, Marcus, Fiona Poland, Juanita Hoe, et al.. (2024). Chatting: Family Carers’ Perspectives on Receiving Support from Dementia Crisis Teams. Healthcare. 12(11). 1122–1122. 1 indexed citations
2.
Tomlin, Jack, Kate Walker, Jen Yates, et al.. (2023). Care for older forensic mental health patients: A consensus guidance document. European Psychiatry. 66(1). e44–e44.
3.
Walker, Kate, Jen Yates, Tom Dening, et al.. (2023). Quality of life, wellbeing, recovery, and progress for older forensic mental health patients: a qualitative investigation based on the perspectives of patients and staff. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. 18(1). 2202978–2202978. 3 indexed citations
4.
Tomlin, Jack, Kate Walker, Jen Yates, et al.. (2022). Older forensic mental healthcare patients in England: demographics, physical health, mental wellbeing, cognitive ability and quality of life. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 9–9. 1 indexed citations
6.
Walker, Kate, Jen Yates, Tom Dening, et al.. (2022). Staff perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of quality of life, health, wellbeing, recovery and reduced risk for older forensic mental-health patients: A qualitative interview study. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 27(4). 287–300. 5 indexed citations
7.
Yates, Jen, et al.. (2022). Going for gold: Sports and exercise groups for people with dementia and carers contribute to their well-being. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 953822–953822. 1 indexed citations
8.
Redley, Marcus, et al.. (2022). Practitioners’ Views on Enabling People With Dementia to Remain in Their Homes During and After Crisis. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 41(12). 2549–2556. 3 indexed citations
9.
Wion, Rachel K., et al.. (2021). The Role of Cognitive Self-Report Measure Type in Predicting Cognitive Decline Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology. 35(4). 487–511. 13 indexed citations
11.
Streater, Amy, Jen Yates, David Challis, et al.. (2020). Development of an Evidence-Based Best Practice Model for Teams Managing Crisis in Dementia: Protocol for a Qualitative Study. JMIR Research Protocols. 10(1). e14781–e14781. 4 indexed citations
12.
Yates, Jen, David Challis, Tom Dening, et al.. (2020). Developing a model of best practice for teams managing crisis in people with dementia: a consensus approach. BMC Psychiatry. 20(1). 505–505. 5 indexed citations
13.
Yates, Jen, et al.. (2020). Conceptualizing Dementia Crisis and Preferences for Resolution: A Public Perspective. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. 11. 3373071610–3373071610. 1 indexed citations
14.
Walker, Kate, Chris Griffiths, Jen Yates, & Birgit Vӧllm. (2020). Service provision for older forensic mental health patients: a scoping review of the literature. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 32(1). 29–50. 2 indexed citations
15.
Yates, Jen, et al.. (2018). Dominant actor and reflection within learning paths. Journal of Workplace Learning. 30(5). 364–376. 7 indexed citations
16.
Streater, Amy, et al.. (2017). A scoping review of crisis teams managing dementia in older people. Clinical Interventions in Aging. Volume 12. 1589–1603. 15 indexed citations
17.
Yates, Jen, et al.. (2017). “You’ve got a friend in me”: can social networks mediate the relationship between mood and MCI?. BMC Geriatrics. 17(1). 144–144. 20 indexed citations
18.
Yates, Jen, Linda Clare, & Bob Woods. (2016). What is the Relationship between Health, Mood, and Mild Cognitive Impairment?. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 55(3). 1183–1193. 18 indexed citations
19.
Yates, Jen, et al.. (2015). Subjective memory complaints, mood and MCI: a follow-up study. Aging & Mental Health. 21(3). 313–321. 92 indexed citations
20.
Yates, Jen. (1983). When will the players get involved?. PubMed. 93(4864). 1111–2. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026