Helen Chester
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Education top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- David ChallisJane HughesCaroline SutcliffePaul ClarksonSue DaviesLinda DaviesChengqiu XieAlexandra Feast
- Topics
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (25 papers)Healthcare innovation and challenges (17 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatryJournal of Advanced Nursing
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Helen Chester
35 papers receiving 276 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- General Health Professions 210
- Psychiatry and Mental health 83
- Education 69
- Economics and Econometrics 67
- Sociology and Political Science 65
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Chester
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Chester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Chester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Chester more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Chester
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Chester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Chester. The network helps show where Helen Chester may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Chester
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Chester. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Chester based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Chester. Helen Chester is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Helen Chester
Helen Chester is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Education, having authored 36 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (25 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (17 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (210 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (83 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). Helen Chester has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include David Challis, Jane Hughes, Caroline Sutcliffe, Paul Clarkson, Sue Davies, Linda Davies, Chengqiu Xie, Alexandra Feast, Michele Abendstern and Fiona Poland. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Journal of Advanced Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.