Luís Nacul
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Neurology top 5%
- Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Papers in
-
- Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research 44
-
- Health, psychology, and well-being 8
- Co-authors
- Eliana Lacerda (37 shared papers)Caroline C. Kingdon (18 shared papers)Derek Pheby (13 shared papers)Fiona Poland (6 shared papers)Peter Campion (6 shared papers)Amanda Howe (3 shared papers)Kathleen Mudie (7 shared papers)Mariam Molokhia (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Medicine (4 papers)Frontiers in Neurology (4 papers)BMC Public Health (3 papers)BMC Neurology (2 papers)Frontiers in Immunology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaBrazil
In The Last Decade
Luís Nacul
70 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.0k
- Neurology 346
- General Health Professions 400
- Sensory Systems 54
- Pharmacology 169
Countries citing papers authored by Luís Nacul
This map shows the geographic impact of Luís Nacul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luís Nacul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luís Nacul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luís Nacul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luís Nacul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luís Nacul. The network helps show where Luís Nacul may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luís Nacul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 189 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 85 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 67 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 64 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 56 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 53 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 51 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 50 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 45 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 40 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 29 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 29 |
About Luís Nacul
Luís Nacul is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Neurology, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (44 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (13 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (10 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (8 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (8 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers) and Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.0k citations), Neurology (346 citations), General Health Professions (400 citations), Sensory Systems (54 citations) and Pharmacology (169 citations). Luís Nacul has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Eliana Lacerda, Caroline C. Kingdon, Derek Pheby, Fiona Poland, Peter Campion, Amanda Howe, Kathleen Mudie, Mariam Molokhia, Nora Pashayan and Jacqueline M. Cliff. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Medicine, Frontiers in Neurology, BMC Public Health, BMC Neurology and Frontiers in Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.