Cheryl Cott

4.9k citations
101 papers · 3.5k indexed · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Cheryl Cott

99 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Cheryl Cott
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Occupational Therapy 376
  • Rehabilitation 612
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 111
  • General Health Professions 1.5k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 848
Replace Gail Mountain with:
Gail Mountain United Kingdom
Monique A. M. Gignac Canada
W.J.A. van den Heuvel Netherlands
Gerd Ahlström Sweden
Mary Ann McColl Canada
Geertrudis A.M. van den Bos Netherlands
Synneve Dahlin‐Ivanoff Sweden
Shane Thomas Australia
Alvisa Palese Italy
Mélanie Levasseur Canada
Cheryl Cott relative to Gail Mountain United Kingdom Gail Mountain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gail Mountain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Cott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Cott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Cott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Cott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Cott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Cott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Cott. The network helps show where Cheryl Cott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Cott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Cott Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Cott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004283
2 1999238
3 2000201
4 2007151
5 1997137
6 2002110
7 200896
8 200288
9 200286
10 199879
11 201675
12 199874
13 201470
14 201060
15 201656
16 201354
17 201453
18 200852
19 200651
20 200750

About Cheryl Cott

Cheryl Cott is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology, Rehabilitation and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 101 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (16 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (16 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (14 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (14 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (13 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (13 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (10 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (376 citations), Rehabilitation (612 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (111 citations), General Health Professions (1.5k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (848 citations). Cheryl Cott has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Monique A. M. Gignac, Elizabeth M. Badley, Rose Wiles, Julie Vaughan‐Graham, Rachel Devitt, Michel D. Landry, Carolyn Steele Gray, Kerry Kuluski, Pia Kontos and Souraya Sidani. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Physiotherapy and JMIR mhealth and uhealth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact