Meridean Maas

139 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Meridean Maas
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • General Health Professions 2.0k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 792
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 653
  • Sociology and Political Science 491
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 445
Replace Karen Spilsbury with:
Karen Spilsbury United Kingdom
Adelaida Zabalegui Spain
Jan Dewing United Kingdom
Minna Stolt Finland
Ruth Harris United Kingdom
Katie Eriksson Finland
Gunilla Borglin Sweden
Myonghwa Park South Korea
Judith E. Hupcey United States
Anne Williams Australia
Meridean Maas relative to Karen Spilsbury United Kingdom Karen Spilsbury's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Karen Spilsbury · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meridean Maas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meridean Maas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meridean Maas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meridean Maas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meridean Maas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meridean Maas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meridean Maas. The network helps show where Meridean Maas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meridean Maas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meridean Maas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meridean Maas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meridean Maas. Meridean Maas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 7
2 3
3 40
4 9
5 2
6
Using the model of mapping Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) to the International Classification of Functioning, disability and health (ICF) to map NANDA, NIC and NOC
2
7 7
8 10
9 1
10 11
11 38
12 35
13
The minimum data set: No longer just for clinical assessment
12
14 4
15
Nursing outcomes classification (NOC) : Iowa outcome project
10
16
Training key to job satisfaction.
33
17 57
18
Geriatric mental health: staff stress on an Alzheimer's unit
5
19 6
20 15

About Meridean Maas

Meridean Maas is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Research and Theory, having authored 144 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (52 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (40 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (445 citations), Research and Theory (119 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (324 citations). Meridean Maas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen C. Buckwalter, Vicki S. Conn, Marilyn Rantz, Marion Johnson, Elizabeth Swanson, Sue Moorhead, Myonghwa Park, Janet Specht, Lisa Skemp Kelley and David Reed. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Care, The Journals of Gerontology Series A and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026