Jonathan Boote

3.4k total citations
41 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Jonathan Boote is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Boote has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Boote's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (21 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (15 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (4 papers). Jonathan Boote is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (21 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (15 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (4 papers). Jonathan Boote collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Jonathan Boote's co-authors include Cindy Cooper, Rosemary Telford, Wendy Baird, Rosemary Barber, Anthea Sutton, Andrew Booth, Ruth Wong, Georgina Jones, Jill Thompson and Paul Ward and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Boote

40 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Boote United Kingdom 23 1.6k 331 324 278 239 41 2.4k
Anton J. Kuzel United States 20 1.0k 0.6× 372 1.1× 312 1.0× 167 0.6× 162 0.7× 49 2.4k
Jonathan Tritter United Kingdom 20 1.1k 0.7× 243 0.7× 390 1.2× 314 1.1× 136 0.6× 50 2.2k
Nick Goodwin United Kingdom 25 1.6k 1.0× 385 1.2× 226 0.7× 309 1.1× 180 0.8× 108 2.6k
Janet Harvey United Kingdom 12 711 0.4× 309 0.9× 320 1.0× 424 1.5× 231 1.0× 23 2.2k
Anita Kothari Canada 34 2.7k 1.7× 565 1.7× 471 1.5× 189 0.7× 303 1.3× 140 4.1k
Nick Fahy United Kingdom 13 1.4k 0.9× 619 1.9× 159 0.5× 107 0.4× 155 0.6× 31 2.3k
Davina Allen United Kingdom 32 1.7k 1.1× 650 2.0× 563 1.7× 213 0.8× 342 1.4× 106 3.2k
Mandy M. Archibald Canada 23 848 0.5× 366 1.1× 672 2.1× 301 1.1× 71 0.3× 77 2.7k
Petri Böckerman Finland 28 1.2k 0.8× 237 0.7× 427 1.3× 106 0.4× 352 1.5× 164 2.8k
Ruth McDonald United Kingdom 35 2.3k 1.4× 388 1.2× 232 0.7× 172 0.6× 425 1.8× 136 3.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Boote

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Boote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Boote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Boote more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Boote

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Boote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Boote. The network helps show where Jonathan Boote may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Boote

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Boote. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Boote based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Boote. Jonathan Boote is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
MacNeill, Stephanie, Livia Pierotti, Mohammed A. Mohammed, et al.. (2019). Identifying exceptional cystic fibrosis care services: combining statistical process control with focus groups. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(6). 1–158. 1 indexed citations
3.
MacNeill, Stephanie, Lı́gia Camera Pierrotti, Martin J Wildman, et al.. (2018). EPS5.08 Quality improvement in CF: what can we learn from each other? A statistical analysis of UK Registry data and consultations with clinicians and patients. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 17. S47–S48.
4.
Boote, Jonathan, Steven A. Julious, Michelle Horspool, et al.. (2016). PPI in the PLEASANT trial: involving children with asthma and their parents in designing an intervention for a randomised controlled trial based within primary care. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 17(6). 536–548. 10 indexed citations
5.
Chiverton, N, et al.. (2014). CAN PHYSIOTHERAPY EFFECTIVELY TREAT PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR RADICULAR SYNDROME SECONDARY TO MRI DEMONSTRABLE DISC PROLAPSE? A PRELIMINARY RANDOMISED TRIAL OF PATIENTS AWAITING LUMBAR MICRO-DISCECTOMY. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume. 28–28. 1 indexed citations
6.
Collins, Karen, et al.. (2014). Making patient and public involvement in cancer and palliative research a reality: academic support is vital for success. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 5(2). 203–206. 17 indexed citations
8.
Horspool, Michelle, Steven A. Julious, Jonathan Boote, et al.. (2013). Preventing and lessening exacerbations of asthma in school-age children associated with a new term (PLEASANT): study protocol for a cluster randomised control trial. Trials. 14(1). 297–297. 16 indexed citations
9.
10.
Boote, Jonathan, Ruth Wong, & Andrew Booth. (2012). ‘Talking the talk or walking the walk?’ A bibliometric review of the literature on public involvement in health research published between 1995 and 2009. Health Expectations. 18(1). 44–57. 142 indexed citations
11.
Boote, Jonathan, Wendy Baird, & Anthea Sutton. (2012). Involving the public in systematic reviews: a narrative review of organizational approaches and eight case examples. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 1(5). 409–420. 30 indexed citations
12.
Barber, Rosemary, et al.. (2011). Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study. Health Expectations. 15(3). 229–241. 83 indexed citations
13.
Boote, Jonathan, Wendy Baird, & Anthea Sutton. (2011). Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: A narrative review of case examples. Health Policy. 102(2-3). 105–116. 95 indexed citations
14.
Thompson, Jill, Rosemary Barber, Paul Ward, et al.. (2009). Health researchers’ attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expectations. 12(2). 209–220. 155 indexed citations
15.
Boote, Jonathan, et al.. (2009). Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: A narrative review of case examples. Health Policy. 95(1). 10–23. 173 indexed citations
16.
Barber, Rosemary, Jonathan Boote, & Cindy Cooper. (2007). Involving consumers successfully in NHS research: a national survey. Health Expectations. 10(4). 380–391. 38 indexed citations
17.
Boote, Jonathan, Rosemary Barber, & Cindy Cooper. (2005). Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: Results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis. Health Policy. 75(3). 280–297. 88 indexed citations
18.
Telford, Rosemary, Jonathan Boote, & Cindy Cooper. (2004). What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expectations. 7(3). 209–220. 138 indexed citations
19.
Boote, Jonathan, et al.. (2004). Psychosocial interventions for people with a milder dementing illness: a systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 45(6). 644–658. 38 indexed citations
20.
Boote, Jonathan. (1998). Towards a comprehensive taxonomy and model of consumer complaining behaviour. University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire). 11. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026