Tom Shakespeare

16.1k total citations · 7 hit papers
163 papers, 8.3k citations indexed

About

Tom Shakespeare is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Shakespeare has authored 163 papers receiving a total of 8.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Safety Research, 33 papers in General Health Professions and 24 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Tom Shakespeare's work include Disability Rights and Representation (45 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (24 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (14 papers). Tom Shakespeare is often cited by papers focused on Disability Rights and Representation (45 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (24 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (14 papers). Tom Shakespeare collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Tom Shakespeare's co-authors include Christopher Mikton, Nicholas Watson, Alana Officer, Mark A Bellis, Karen Hughes, Sara Wood, Geoff Bates, Lindsay Eckley, Ellie McCoy and Lisa Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Nature Medicine and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Tom Shakespeare

147 papers receiving 7.4k citations

Hit Papers

Disability Rights and Wrongs 1994 2026 2004 2015 2006 2012 1994 2007 2013 250 500 750

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Tom Shakespeare 3.7k 2.3k 2.0k 1.6k 1.5k 163 8.3k
Jean E. Rhodes 3.6k 1.0× 2.2k 1.0× 3.5k 1.8× 3.7k 2.3× 1.1k 0.7× 179 10.6k
Robert Crosnoe 1.2k 0.3× 3.0k 1.3× 3.0k 1.5× 4.8k 3.0× 1.6k 1.1× 173 10.7k
Peter Benson 2.7k 0.7× 2.3k 1.0× 2.4k 1.2× 1.8k 1.1× 1.3k 0.9× 136 7.5k
J. Lawrence Aber 1.7k 0.5× 3.0k 1.3× 5.3k 2.6× 4.4k 2.8× 2.2k 1.5× 218 11.3k
Carol Thomas 1.4k 0.4× 1.9k 0.8× 1.1k 0.6× 797 0.5× 1.6k 1.1× 116 5.9k
Barbara Wolfe 1.2k 0.3× 2.8k 1.2× 847 0.4× 2.2k 1.4× 2.0k 1.3× 179 8.4k
Ingrid Schoon 967 0.3× 2.3k 1.0× 1.5k 0.8× 2.1k 1.3× 971 0.6× 169 6.5k
Hirokazu Yoshikawa 1.5k 0.4× 2.7k 1.2× 4.7k 2.3× 5.9k 3.7× 1.8k 1.2× 284 11.7k
Peter A. Creed 2.4k 0.6× 981 0.4× 1.3k 0.6× 2.3k 1.4× 1.6k 1.1× 216 7.6k
Katariina Salmela‐Aro 1.4k 0.4× 2.4k 1.1× 5.3k 2.6× 4.5k 2.8× 2.6k 1.7× 349 15.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Shakespeare

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Shakespeare's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Shakespeare with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Shakespeare more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Shakespeare

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Shakespeare. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Shakespeare. The network helps show where Tom Shakespeare may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Shakespeare

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Shakespeare. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Shakespeare based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Shakespeare. Tom Shakespeare is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hunt, Xanthe, Shaffa Hameed, Francisco Diez‐Canseco, et al.. (2025). How inclusive were strategies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 for people with disabilities? Evidence from qualitative research in eight low- and middle-income countries. International Journal for Equity in Health. 24(1). 121–121.
2.
Omigbodun, Olayinka, Grace Ryan, Dixon Chibanda, et al.. (2023). Reprioritising global mental health: psychoses in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Mental Health Systems. 17(1). 6–6. 9 indexed citations
3.
Hunt, Xanthe, et al.. (2023). Effectiveness of Social Inclusion Interventions for Anxiety and Depression among Adolescents: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(3). 1895–1895. 6 indexed citations
4.
Poland, Fiona, et al.. (2023). Can a disability studies‐medical sociology rapprochement help re‐value the work disabled people do within their rehabilitation?. Sociology of Health & Illness. 45(6). 1300–1316. 6 indexed citations
5.
Pearson, Charlotte, Nicholas Watson, Richard Brunner, et al.. (2022). Covid-19 and the Crisis in Social Care: Exploring the Experiences of Disabled People in the Pandemic. Social Policy and Society. 22(3). 515–530. 15 indexed citations
6.
Shakespeare, Tom, Nicholas Watson, Richard Brunner, et al.. (2021). Disabled people in Britain and the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Social Policy and Administration. 56(1). 103–117. 64 indexed citations
7.
Stickley, Andrew, Naoki Kondo, Bayard Roberts, et al.. (2021). Disability and psychological distress in nine countries of the former Soviet Union. Journal of Affective Disorders. 292. 782–787. 5 indexed citations
8.
Shakespeare, Tom, et al.. (2021). Triple jeopardy: disabled people and the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. 397(10282). 1331–1333. 152 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
King, Tania, Marissa Shields, Allison Milner, et al.. (2019). Conformity to masculine norms: Differences between men with and without a disability.. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 21(3). 380–391. 1 indexed citations
10.
Shakespeare, Tom, et al.. (2019). Performance management: a qualitative study of relational boundaries in personal assistance. Sociology of Health & Illness. 42(1). 191–206. 17 indexed citations
11.
Shakespeare, Tom. (2019). When the political becomes personal: Reflecting on disability bioethics. Bioethics. 33(8). 914–921. 8 indexed citations
12.
Shakespeare, Tom & R G Hull. (2018). Termination of Pregnancy After Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Ethical Considerations. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 4 indexed citations
14.
Shakespeare, Tom, Hannah Zeilig, & Peter Mittler. (2017). Rights in Mind: Thinking Differently About Dementia and Disability. Dementia. 18(3). 1075–1088. 96 indexed citations
15.
Perkins, Amorette, et al.. (2016). Perspectives and experiences of the process of mental health diagnosis: a systematic review:Protocol. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia).
16.
Wilsher, Stephanie Howard, Lisa Irvine, Hong Fan, et al.. (2015). Systematic overview of economic evaluations of health-related rehabilitation. Disability and health journal. 9(1). 11–25. 54 indexed citations
17.
Shi, Xiuquan, Krista K. Wheeler, Junxin Shi, et al.. (2014). Increased risk of unintentional injuries in adults with disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Disability and health journal. 8(2). 153–164. 17 indexed citations
18.
Shakespeare, Tom. (2012). Disability, Hate Crime and Violence, Alan Roulstone, Hannah Mason-Bish (Eds.). Routledge (2012), 208, £80·00. ISBN 9780415674317. The Lancet. 1 indexed citations
19.
Shakespeare, Tom. (2002). Birds, bees and laser beams: the idea of parents choosing the sex of their children is no longer science fiction.. PubMed. 176(2369). 23–23. 1 indexed citations
20.
Corker, Mairian & Tom Shakespeare. (2002). Disability/postmodernity : embodying disability theory. Continuum eBooks. 176 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026