Tom Dening

10.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
219 papers, 5.4k citations indexed

About

Tom Dening is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Dening has authored 219 papers receiving a total of 5.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 73 papers in General Health Professions, 71 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 35 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Tom Dening's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (52 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (39 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (24 papers). Tom Dening is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (52 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (39 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (24 papers). Tom Dening collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Tom Dening's co-authors include Carol Brayne, Fiona E. Matthews, Felicia A. Huppert, G. E. Berrios, Rianne M. van der Linde, Eugene S. Paykel, Carol Coupland, Julia Hippisley–Cox, Michael Moore and Blossom C. M. Stephan and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Tom Dening

202 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Hit Papers

Anticholinergic Drug Exposure and the Risk of Dementia 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 100 200 300

Peers

Tom Dening
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 2.1k
  • General Health Professions 1.4k
  • Clinical Psychology 729
  • Physiology 553
  • Health 499
Replace Daniel O’Connor with:
Daniel O’Connor Australia
Josep Garre‐Olmo Spain
Barry W. Rovner United States
Jane S. Saczynski United States
Lee‐Fay Low Australia
Amy L. Byers United States
Holly Tuokko Canada
Michael Pentzek Germany
Daisy Acosta Dominican Republic
Wagner Silva Ribeiro Brazil
Daniel O’Connor Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Tom Dening
Tom Dening · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Tom Dening
Tom Dening · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Dening

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Dening's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Dening with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Dening more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Dening

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Dening. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Dening. The network helps show where Tom Dening may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Dening

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Dening. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Dening based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Dening. Tom Dening is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 6
2 2
3 2
4 2
5 0
6 9
7 8
8 1
9 8
10 9
11 31
12 4
13 3
14 17
15 8
16 10
17 222
18 43
19 54
20 12

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026