Felicitas Biwer
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Anique B. H. de BruinMirjam G.A. oude EgbrinkWisnu WiradhanyPauline AaltenWalter JansenMirjam oude EgbrinkHarm J. HospersAdam M. Persky
- Topics
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers)Online and Blended Learning (4 papers)Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsIndonesiaTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Felicitas Biwer
13 papers receiving 376 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Education 189
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 154
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 75
- Social Psychology 68
- Clinical Psychology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Felicitas Biwer
This map shows the geographic impact of Felicitas Biwer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felicitas Biwer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felicitas Biwer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Felicitas Biwer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felicitas Biwer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felicitas Biwer. The network helps show where Felicitas Biwer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felicitas Biwer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felicitas Biwer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felicitas Biwer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felicitas Biwer. Felicitas Biwer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | Changes and Adaptations: How University Students Self-Regulate Their Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemicbreakdown → | 133 |
| 13 | 110 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 12 |
About Felicitas Biwer
Felicitas Biwer is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (154 citations), Education (189 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (75 citations). Felicitas Biwer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Indonesia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Anique B. H. de Bruin, Mirjam G.A. oude Egbrink, Wisnu Wiradhany, Pauline Aalten, Walter Jansen, Mirjam oude Egbrink, Harm J. Hospers, Adam M. Persky, Georg Brunner and Timo Leuders. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Educational Psychology Review and Learning and Instruction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.