Felicitas Biwer

684 total citations · 1 hit paper
15 papers, 393 citations indexed

About

Felicitas Biwer is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Felicitas Biwer has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 393 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 8 papers in Education and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Felicitas Biwer's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers). Felicitas Biwer is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers). Felicitas Biwer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Indonesia and Taiwan. Felicitas Biwer's co-authors include Anique B. H. de Bruin, Mirjam G.A. oude Egbrink, Wisnu Wiradhany, Pauline Aalten, Walter Jansen, Mirjam oude Egbrink, Harm J. Hospers, Adam M. Persky, Georg Brunner and Timo Leuders and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Educational Psychology Review and Learning and Instruction.

In The Last Decade

Felicitas Biwer

13 papers receiving 376 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Changes and Adaptations: How University Students Self-Regulate Their Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 133 citations Felicitas Biwer, Wisnu Wiradhany et al. Frontiers in Psychology profile →

Peers

Felicitas Biwer

EDUCA

DEP

ECP

SP

CP

Teresa Ober United States

Sonia Zaccoletti Italy

Jianpeng Guo China

Amanda Carr United Kingdom

Bradley W. Bergey United States

Laura Dörrenbächer‐Ulrich Germany

Wisnu Wiradhany Netherlands

Marcello Passarelli Italy

Ivana Di Leo Canada

Nils Machts Germany

Teresa Ober United States

Felicitas Biwer

139 ×0.7

EDUCA

181 ×1.2

DEP

104 ×1.4

ECP

50 ×0.7

SP

37 ×0.6

CP

Citations per year, relative to Felicitas Biwer Felicitas Biwer (= 1×) peers Teresa Ober

Countries citing papers authored by Felicitas Biwer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felicitas Biwer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felicitas Biwer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felicitas Biwer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felicitas Biwer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felicitas Biwer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felicitas Biwer. The network helps show where Felicitas Biwer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felicitas Biwer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felicitas Biwer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felicitas Biwer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felicitas Biwer. Felicitas Biwer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Biwer, Felicitas, et al.. (2025). Comparing a sociological and psychological approach to summer bridge programs: a field experiment. Higher Education.

2.

Biwer, Felicitas, et al.. (2025). How undergraduate engineering students regulate their learning: a qualitative comparison between different strategy users. European Journal of Engineering Education. 50(4). 744–763. 1 indexed citations

3.

Biwer, Felicitas, et al.. (2024). Optimizing self-organized study orders: combining refutations and metacognitive prompts improves the use of interleaved practice. npj Science of Learning. 9(1). 33–33. 4 indexed citations

4.

Biwer, Felicitas, et al.. (2024). The Relation Between Perceived Mental Effort, Monitoring Judgments, and Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. 36(3). 5 indexed citations

5.

Biwer, Felicitas, et al.. (2024). Preaching Through the Choir. What Interprofessional Education Can Learn From Choir Singing. Perspectives on Medical Education. 13(1). 274–279.

6.

Biwer, Felicitas, et al.. (2024). The challenge of change: understanding the role of habits in university students’ self-regulated learning. Higher Education. 88(5). 2037–2055. 4 indexed citations

7.

Biwer, Felicitas, et al.. (2024). Instruction meets experience: Using theory- and experience-based methods to promote the use of desirable difficulties. Learning and Instruction. 93. 101942–101942. 5 indexed citations

8.

Biwer, Felicitas, Wisnu Wiradhany, Mirjam G.A. oude Egbrink, & Anique B. H. de Bruin. (2023). Understanding effort regulation: Comparing ‘Pomodoro’ breaks and self‐regulated breaks. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 93(S2). 353–367. 15 indexed citations

9.

Bruin, Anique B. H. de, et al.. (2023). Worth the Effort: the Start and Stick to Desirable Difficulties (S2D2) Framework. Educational Psychology Review. 35(2). 33 indexed citations

10.

Biwer, Felicitas, Anique B. H. de Bruin, & Adam M. Persky. (2022). Study smart – impact of a learning strategy training on students’ study behavior and academic performance. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 28(1). 147–167. 31 indexed citations

11.

Wiradhany, Wisnu, et al.. (2022). Growing Out of the Experience: How Subjective Experiences of Effort and Learning Influence the Use of Interleaved Practice. Educational Psychology Review. 34(4). 2451–2484. 22 indexed citations

12.

Biwer, Felicitas, Wisnu Wiradhany, Mirjam oude Egbrink, et al.. (2021). Changes and Adaptations: How University Students Self-Regulate Their Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 642593–642593. 133 indexed citations breakdown →

13.

Biwer, Felicitas, Mirjam G.A. oude Egbrink, Pauline Aalten, & Anique B. H. de Bruin. (2020). Fostering effective learning strategies in higher education—A mixed-methods study.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 9(2). 186–203. 110 indexed citations

14.

Biwer, Felicitas, et al.. (2020). Future steps in teaching desirably difficult learning strategies: Reflections from the study smart program.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 9(4). 439–446. 18 indexed citations

15.

Biwer, Felicitas, et al.. (2019). Make it relevant! How prior instructions foster the integration of teacher knowledge. Instructional Science. 47(6). 711–739. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact