Family Business Review

911 papers and 69.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 911 papers published in Family Business Review in the last decades have received a total of 69.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Family Business Review usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (792 papers), Management of Technology and Innovation (480 papers) and Accounting (424 papers) specifically the topics of Family Business Performance and Succession (786 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (480 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (398 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Family Business Review are Pramodita Sharma, Joseph H. Astrachan, Andrea Colli, William G. Dyer, Wendy C. Handler, Shaker A. Zahra, Thomas Zellweger, James J. Chrisman, John L. Ward and Timothy G. Habbershon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Family Business Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Family Business Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Family Business Review.

Countries where authors publish in Family Business Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Family Business Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Family Business Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Family Business Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025