Albert E. James

557 total citations
9 papers, 403 citations indexed

About

Albert E. James is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Albert E. James has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 403 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 7 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 5 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Albert E. James's work include Family Business Performance and Succession (9 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (7 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers). Albert E. James is often cited by papers focused on Family Business Performance and Succession (9 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (7 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers). Albert E. James collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Chile and United Kingdom. Albert E. James's co-authors include P. Devereaux Jennings, Rhonda Breitkreuz, Maribel Guerrero, Allan Discua Cruz, Eric Clinton, Εlias Hadjielias, Robert S. Nason, Rodrigo Basco and Salvatore Sciascia and has published in prestigious journals such as Family Business Review, Human Resource Management Review and Family Relations.

In The Last Decade

Albert E. James

9 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Albert E. James Canada 7 386 318 216 86 29 9 403
Rania Labaki France 9 309 0.8× 254 0.8× 167 0.8× 77 0.9× 16 0.6× 20 339
Elmarie Venter South Africa 8 301 0.8× 258 0.8× 158 0.7× 52 0.6× 13 0.4× 12 333
Irmak Erdogan Türkiye 3 215 0.6× 166 0.5× 87 0.4× 61 0.7× 24 0.8× 4 264
Jan‐Philipp Ahrens Germany 7 291 0.8× 238 0.7× 178 0.8× 45 0.5× 16 0.6× 26 324
Daniela Suchy Austria 5 273 0.7× 196 0.6× 142 0.7× 39 0.5× 20 0.7× 8 290
Colleen Lief Switzerland 3 224 0.6× 152 0.5× 108 0.5× 38 0.4× 6 0.2× 4 254
Roberto H. Flören Netherlands 7 262 0.7× 190 0.6× 172 0.8× 38 0.4× 9 0.3× 22 294
Lars-Göran Sund Sweden 9 291 0.8× 208 0.7× 198 0.9× 59 0.7× 5 0.2× 25 333
Tomasz A. Fediuk United States 4 115 0.3× 79 0.2× 47 0.2× 60 0.7× 4 0.1× 5 186
Susan Müller Switzerland 7 91 0.2× 198 0.6× 32 0.1× 14 0.2× 89 3.1× 19 231

Countries citing papers authored by Albert E. James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Albert E. James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albert E. James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albert E. James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Albert E. James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albert E. James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albert E. James. The network helps show where Albert E. James may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Albert E. James

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Albert E. James. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Albert E. James based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Albert E. James. Albert E. James is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
James, Albert E., Εlias Hadjielias, Maribel Guerrero, Allan Discua Cruz, & Rodrigo Basco. (2020). Entrepreneurial families in business across generations, contexts and cultures. Journal of Family Business Management. 11(4). 355–367. 41 indexed citations
2.
Jennings, P. Devereaux, et al.. (2017). Bifurcated HR practices in family firms: Insights from the normative-adaptive approach to stepfamilies. Human Resource Management Review. 28(1). 68–82. 49 indexed citations
3.
James, Albert E. & P. Devereaux Jennings. (2017). Is It Better to Govern Managers via Agency or Stewardship? Examining Asymmetries by Family Versus Nonfamily Affiliation. Family Business Review. 30(3). 262–283. 51 indexed citations
4.
Jennings, P. Devereaux, Rhonda Breitkreuz, & Albert E. James. (2014). Theories from Family Science: A Review andRoadmap for Family Business Research. 25–46. 45 indexed citations
5.
James, Albert E. & P. Devereaux Jennings. (2014). Buoys & Anchors: Owning Family Behaviours that Influence Non-family Manager Preferences to Stay. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2014(1). 10401–10401. 1 indexed citations
6.
Sciascia, Salvatore, et al.. (2013). Family Communication and Innovativeness in Family Firms. Family Relations. 62(3). 429–442. 42 indexed citations
7.
Jennings, P. Devereaux, Rhonda Breitkreuz, & Albert E. James. (2013). When Family Members Are Also Business Owners: Is Entrepreneurship Good for Families?. Family Relations. 62(3). 472–489. 49 indexed citations
8.
James, Albert E.. (2013). Why they stay: Examining the intentions of non-family managers to remain employed in family firms. University of Alberta Library. 1 indexed citations
9.
James, Albert E., P. Devereaux Jennings, & Rhonda Breitkreuz. (2011). Worlds Apart?. Family Business Review. 25(1). 87–108. 124 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026