Eng Tek Ong

620 total citations
67 papers, 402 citations indexed

About

Eng Tek Ong is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eng Tek Ong has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 402 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Education, 10 papers in Information Systems and 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Eng Tek Ong's work include Education and Critical Thinking Development (19 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (15 papers) and Education and Islamic Studies (13 papers). Eng Tek Ong is often cited by papers focused on Education and Critical Thinking Development (19 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (15 papers) and Education and Islamic Studies (13 papers). Eng Tek Ong collaborates with scholars based in Malaysia, Indonesia and United Kingdom. Eng Tek Ong's co-authors include Kenneth Ruthven, Choon Fu Goh, Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh, Mazlini Adnan, Noriah Mohd Ishak, David F. Treagust, Ahmad Nurulazam Md Zain, Mageswary Karpudewan, Lilia Halim and A. L. Chandrasegaran and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Research in Science & Technological Education and Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education.

In The Last Decade

Eng Tek Ong

58 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eng Tek Ong Malaysia 12 345 79 57 15 14 67 402
Julie Smart United States 9 403 1.2× 46 0.6× 150 2.6× 19 1.3× 16 1.1× 20 477
Helen Georgiou Australia 9 188 0.5× 34 0.4× 57 1.0× 27 1.8× 8 0.6× 31 287
Erol Taş Türkiye 9 283 0.8× 51 0.6× 70 1.2× 7 0.5× 16 1.1× 32 346
Fer Coenders Netherlands 7 283 0.8× 35 0.4× 86 1.5× 8 0.5× 7 0.5× 16 336
Simone Abels Germany 9 197 0.6× 21 0.3× 54 0.9× 8 0.5× 10 0.7× 37 259
Sinan Özgelen Türkiye 9 343 1.0× 49 0.6× 96 1.7× 4 0.3× 10 0.7× 18 382
Fred Wiegant Netherlands 4 143 0.4× 32 0.4× 81 1.4× 10 0.7× 19 1.4× 5 236
Scott Slough United States 10 205 0.6× 39 0.5× 91 1.6× 4 0.3× 12 0.9× 28 274
Kathy Malone United States 10 223 0.6× 30 0.4× 79 1.4× 14 0.9× 41 2.9× 29 282
Aeran Choi United States 11 398 1.2× 28 0.4× 261 4.6× 15 1.0× 10 0.7× 35 447

Countries citing papers authored by Eng Tek Ong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eng Tek Ong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eng Tek Ong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eng Tek Ong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eng Tek Ong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eng Tek Ong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eng Tek Ong. The network helps show where Eng Tek Ong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eng Tek Ong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eng Tek Ong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eng Tek Ong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eng Tek Ong. Eng Tek Ong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2025). Development and impact of histoguide application towards drawing and labelling in microscopic practical. LUMAT International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education. 12(4). 6–6.
2.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2024). Evaluating the teaching ability of double-qualified teachers in Chinese vocational education: A questionnaire validation study. International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES. 11(10). 61–75.
3.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2024). The Effects of Instruction of Formulaic Sequences and Working Memory on Malaysian ESL Learners’ Oral Fluency. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. 24(4). 192–213.
5.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2021). 5E Inquiry-Based Teaching Module for Primary School Science Teachers: A Need Analysis. Review of International Geographical Education Online. 11(4). 730–737. 2 indexed citations
6.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2020). Academic Motivation and Self Efficacy of Teachers and Students at Higher Secondary Level in Pakistan. The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 9(12). 418–430. 4 indexed citations
7.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2020). THE The Effectiveness of a Professional Development Program on the use of STEM-based 5E Inquiry Learning Model for Science Teachers in China. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 31(2). 179–184. 15 indexed citations
8.
Goh, Choon Fu & Eng Tek Ong. (2019). Flipped classroom as an effective approach in enhancing student learning of a pharmacy course with a historically low student pass rate. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 11(6). 621–629. 43 indexed citations
9.
Adnan, Mazlini, et al.. (2017). Memperkasa pembangunan modal insan Malaysia di peringkat kanakkanak: Kajian kebolehlaksanaan dan kebolehintegrasian pendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum PERMATA Negara(Enhancing Malaysian human capital from early childhood: A study in the feasibility and integratability of the STEM system in the PERMATA Negara curriculum). Malaysian Journal of Society and Space. 12(1). 4 indexed citations
10.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2016). The effectiveness of an in-service training of early childhood teachers on stem integration through Project-Based Inquiry Learning (PIL). Journal of Turkish Science Education. 13. 44–58. 25 indexed citations
11.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2015). How do good teachers teach for critical thinking. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
12.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2014). Penguasaan Kemahiran Proses Sains Asas dalam Kalangan Murid India di Beberapa Buah Sekolah Rendah di Perak. Sains Humanika. 2(1). 5 indexed citations
13.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2013). KEBERKESANAN PENGGUNAAN MODUL KARTUN DALAM MENINGKATKAN PENCAPAIAN BIOLOGI PELAJAR. 2 indexed citations
14.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2013). ACQUISITION OF BASIC AND INTEGRATED SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS AMONGST FORM 2 STUDENTS IN SARAWAK. 1 indexed citations
15.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2012). KESAN PENGGUNAAN PEMBELAJARAN BERASASKAN MASALAH TERHADAP PENCAPAIAN BIOLOGI DALAM KALANGAN PELAJAR TINGKATAN 4.
16.
Ong, Eng Tek & Kenneth Ruthven. (2012). The Effectiveness of Smart Schooling in Terms of Student Achievement in Science: A Study of Malaysian Practice.. 35(1). 1–21. 1 indexed citations
17.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2011). The Development and Validation of an All-Encompassing Malaysian-Based Science Process Skills Test for Secondary Schools.. 34(2). 203–236. 4 indexed citations
18.
Ong, Eng Tek, et al.. (2007). Science Anxiety among Form Four Students in Penang: A Gender Comparison.. 30(1). 84–109. 1 indexed citations
19.
Ong, Eng Tek & Kenneth Ruthven. (2005). Acquisition of Science Process Skills amongst Form 3 Students in Malaysian Smart and Mainstream Schools.. 28(1). 103–124. 7 indexed citations
20.
Ong, Eng Tek & Kenneth Ruthven. (2004). Investigating the Smart Science Learning Experience amongst Malaysian Students.. 27(1). 87–116. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026