Emma Medford

15 total papers · 582 total citations
11 papers, 440 citations indexed

About

Emma Medford is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Biochemistry and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Medford has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 440 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4 papers in Clinical Biochemistry and 4 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Emma Medford's work include Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers). Emma Medford is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers). Emma Medford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Emma Medford's co-authors include Sarah Logan, Naomi Hughes, Sarah McGeown, Dougal Julian Hare, Anja Wittkowski, Simon Jones, Stewart Rust, Rhona S. Johnston and Debbie Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Learning and Individual Differences, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology and Reading and Writing.

In The Last Decade

Emma Medford

11 papers receiving 415 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emma Medford 216 201 105 71 68 11 440
Jill K. Duthie 304 1.4× 131 0.7× 65 0.6× 17 0.2× 3 0.0× 9 417
Roberta E. Dihoff 168 0.8× 217 1.1× 43 0.4× 32 0.5× 1 0.0× 21 458
Torstein Låg 67 0.3× 170 0.8× 66 0.6× 42 0.6× 12 422
Rita Senf 178 0.8× 13 0.1× 30 0.3× 49 0.7× 6 0.1× 12 376
Caroline Scheiber 73 0.3× 90 0.4× 113 1.1× 20 0.3× 15 373
Valerie A. Cool 49 0.2× 164 0.8× 46 0.4× 37 0.5× 2 0.0× 15 484
Robert Ayres 86 0.4× 138 0.7× 25 0.2× 35 0.5× 22 395
Cassie Freeman 108 0.5× 137 0.7× 46 0.4× 69 1.0× 7 411
Jeanette McCarthy Gallagher 218 1.0× 163 0.8× 107 1.0× 76 1.1× 17 478
Anita Heijltjes 200 0.9× 308 1.5× 82 0.8× 35 0.5× 17 494

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Medford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Medford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Medford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Medford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Medford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Medford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Medford. The network helps show where Emma Medford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Medford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Medford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Medford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Medford. Emma Medford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026