Emma E. Buchtel

2.3k citations
26 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Emma E. Buchtel

26 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Emma E. Buchtel
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Social Psychology 643
  • Applied Psychology 108
  • Health 126
  • Communication 101
  • Clinical Psychology 268
Replace Boris Bizumić with:
Boris Bizumić Australia
Janetta Lun United States
Roni Porat Israel
Michael A. Zárate United States
Steve A. Nida United States
Julie Spencer‐Rodgers United States
Kristin L. Sommer United States
Vinai Norasakkunkit United States
Emina Subašić Australia
E. Olcay İmamoğlu Türkiye
Emma E. Buchtel relative to Boris Bizumić Australia Boris Bizumić's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Boris Bizumić · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma E. Buchtel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma E. Buchtel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma E. Buchtel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma E. Buchtel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma E. Buchtel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma E. Buchtel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma E. Buchtel. The network helps show where Emma E. Buchtel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma E. Buchtel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma E. Buchtel Line = papers co-authored together Emma E. Buchtel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008212
2 2008141
3 2017100
4 201583
5 201573
6 200971
7 201857
8 200857
9 200950
10 201947
11 201846
12 201543
13 201340
14 201732
15 201620
16 201920
17 201319
18 201712
19 20218
20 20095

About Emma E. Buchtel

Emma E. Buchtel is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Communication, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (19 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (16 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (643 citations), Applied Psychology (108 citations), Health (126 citations), Communication (101 citations) and Clinical Psychology (268 citations). Emma E. Buchtel has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven J. Heine, Ara Norenzayan, Sylvia Xiaohua Chen, Yanjun Guan, Michael Harris Bond, Ben C. P. Lam, Jacky C. K. Ng, Yanjie Su, Eva Kundtová Klocová and Will M. Gervais. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Res Philosophica and Judgment and Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact