Mark Aveyard

2.6k total citations
10 papers, 767 citations indexed

About

Mark Aveyard is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Aveyard has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 767 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark Aveyard's work include Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers). Mark Aveyard is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers). Mark Aveyard collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Arab Emirates and Netherlands. Mark Aveyard's co-authors include Rolf A. Zwaan, Richard H. Yaxley, Carol J. Madden, Michael P. Kaschak, David J. Therriault, Tapani Riekki, Joseph Bulbulia, Eva Kundtová Klocová, Emma E. Buchtel and Dimitris Xygalatas and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Cognition and Memory & Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Mark Aveyard

10 papers receiving 728 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Aveyard United States	10	438	421	229	208	163	10	767
Paulo Sousa United Kingdom	17	84 0.2×	392 0.9×	394 1.7×	275 1.3×	104 0.6×	31	694
Grant J. Rich United States	12	126 0.3×	315 0.7×	60 0.3×	162 0.8×	42 0.3×	47	681
Marianne G. Taylor United States	10	98 0.2×	301 0.7×	111 0.5×	372 1.8×	330 2.0×	16	768
Ursina Teuscher United States	14	288 0.7×	194 0.5×	142 0.6×	66 0.3×	63 0.4×	23	626
Anne K. Hickling United States	12	115 0.3×	333 0.8×	182 0.8×	82 0.4×	733 4.5×	14	932
William R. Charlesworth United States	14	231 0.5×	439 1.0×	75 0.3×	235 1.1×	270 1.7×	33	827
Kara Weisman United States	11	51 0.1×	233 0.6×	150 0.7×	234 1.1×	112 0.7×	23	509
Mary Driver Leinbach United States	14	154 0.4×	230 0.5×	62 0.3×	237 1.1×	114 0.7×	20	996
Robert W. Fuhrman United States	11	133 0.3×	271 0.6×	146 0.6×	227 1.1×	87 0.5×	19	533
Hsiu‐Zu Ho United States	15	378 0.9×	197 0.5×	87 0.4×	92 0.4×	175 1.1×	30	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Aveyard

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Aveyard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Aveyard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Aveyard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Aveyard

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Aveyard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Aveyard. The network helps show where Mark Aveyard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Aveyard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Aveyard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Aveyard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Aveyard. Mark Aveyard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Rios, Kimberly & Mark Aveyard. (2019). Science-religion compatibility beliefs across Middle Eastern and American young adult samples: The role of cross-cultural exposure. Public Understanding of Science. 28(8). 949–957. 13 indexed citations

Gervais, Will M., Michiel van Elk, Dimitris Xygalatas, et al.. (2018). Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?. Judgment and Decision Making. 13(3). 268–274. 57 indexed citations

Gervais, Will M., Dimitris Xygalatas, Ryan McKay, et al.. (2017). Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists. Nature Human Behaviour. 1(8). 100 indexed citations

Eriksson, Kimmo, Pontus Strimling, Per Andersson, et al.. (2017). Cultural Universals and Cultural Differences in Meta-Norms about Peer Punishment. Management and Organization Review. 13(4). 851–870. 27 indexed citations

Gervais, Will M., Michiel van Elk, Dimitris Xygalatas, et al.. (2017). Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 32 indexed citations

Aveyard, Mark. (2014). A Call to Honesty: Extending Religious Priming of Moral Behavior to Middle Eastern Muslims. PLoS ONE. 9(7). e99447–e99447. 51 indexed citations

Aveyard, Mark. (2011). Some consonants sound curvy: Effects of sound symbolism on object recognition. Memory & Cognition. 40(1). 83–92. 39 indexed citations

Kaschak, Michael P., Rolf A. Zwaan, Mark Aveyard, & Richard H. Yaxley. (2006). Perception of Auditory Motion Affects Language Processing. Cognitive Science. 30(4). 733–744. 62 indexed citations

Kaschak, Michael P., Carol J. Madden, David J. Therriault, et al.. (2004). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition. 94(3). B79–B89. 231 indexed citations

10.

Zwaan, Rolf A., Carol J. Madden, Richard H. Yaxley, & Mark Aveyard. (2004). Moving words: dynamic representations in language comprehension*. Cognitive Science. 28(4). 611–619. 155 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact