Replace Journal of Behavioral Decision Making with:
Journal of Behavioral Decision MakingUnited States
Nature Human BehaviourUnited States
Journal of Experimental Psychology AppliedUnited States
Marketing LettersUnited States
Social CognitionUnited States
Journal of Risk and UncertaintyUnited States
Experimental EconomicsUnited States
Review of General PsychologyUnited States
Developmental ReviewUnited States
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical PsychologyUnited States
Journal of Behavioral Decision MakingUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Judgment and Decision Making
Judgment and Decision Making · 1×
×1.312.5kSPS
×2.118.4kGDS
×1.18.4kCN
×1.37.3kSP
×1.78.0kAP
Citations per year, relative to Judgment and Decision Making
Judgment and Decision Making · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Judgment and Decision Making
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Judgment and Decision Making. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Judgment and Decision Making with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judgment and Decision Making more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Judgment and Decision Making
This network shows the impact of papers published in Judgment and Decision Making. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Judgment and Decision Making.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.